Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #12157
    257 446 4 E
    post #12119
    449 794 3 E
    post #12131
    114 191 2 E
    post #11546
    92 130 3 E

    I also tried to use stable diffusion but I only got very strange pictures, I used the models you linked but I never got any picture like yours. Especially penetration pictures never generated. Can you maybe make a tutorial how you work with sd and gigapixel? That would be awesome :)

    I really like your art

  • |
  • -1
  • post #12052
    300 577 3 E
    post #12052
    300 577 3 E
    post #12044
    479 955 5 E
    post #12153
    77 119 1 E
    post #12066
    30 43 3 S
    post #12119
    449 794 3 E
    post #12060
    651 1.2k 5 E

    vwulf said:
    Gorgeous pic, that owl looks irritated though.

    They're fucking in my cave.
    Again.
    -.-'

    randomrabbit said:
    Love this dragoness <3 So hot

    I wouldn't complain if more human/dragon images were created with her in the future.

  • |
  • 8
  • post #12097
    184 284 2 E
    post #12113
    154 240 1 E
    post #12093
    31 43 1 S

    Having someone that genuinely cares for you is an invaluable treasure that must be cherished. Never forget to tell your loved ones how much you care for them.

  • |
  • 7
  • post #11136
    62 73 6 S
    post #11278
    54 95 1 E
    post #12046
    96 131 1 E
    post #12082
    69 117 4 E
    post #10646
    34 61 3 E

    kekanzek said:
    Prompt?

    Positiv Promts : <lr>,zoe, ((high quality)), black body red fur,wolf,[ear ring],smile,red eyes, looking at viewer,smile, teeth, head portrait,cinematic lighting,shaded by nnecgrau f-r95 ,breasts out,nipples,open mouth,cum on tongue,hands on breasts,

    Negativ Promts:<EasyNegative>,<By bad artist -neg>,<badhandv4>,<bad-picture-chill-75v><deformityv6>

  • |
  • 0
  • post #12066
    30 43 3 S
    post #12060
    651 1.2k 5 E
    post #12049
    120 202 2 E
    post #12066
    30 43 3 S
    post #12107
    22 45 1 E
    post #12104
    13 25 1 E

    Cute concept. Hmm, there are floating hands, a completely disfigured face and missing leg there. Try running this through AUTOMATIC1111 or another site that supports img2img, could get improved results!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #12106
    12 22 1 E

    The hands and faces might need a few more cycles. I'd recommend running your wedding set through AUTOMATIC1111 with some extra LORAs for added detail for higher quality

  • |
  • 0
  • post #9868
    31 30 2 S
    post #12082
    69 117 4 E
    post #11250
    42 96 1 E
    post #11136
    62 73 6 S
    115 230 5 E

    gilkardex said:
    Here you go ;)

    female deer getting fucked from behind, bent over, anthro, duo, perfect eyes, long eyelashes, sexy, (deer), (red hair, long hair), brown fur, blue eyes, (dirndl:1.2, eyelashes, ((orgasm:1.5, (clenching teeth:0.5), roll up eyes, Pleasure, pure bliss)), (motion lines:1.5, moan:1.3), thigh highs, (sex, Penetration), (doggystyle), BREAK (detailed background:1.3), (cinematic lighting), detailed ambient light, (detailed lighting), (ambient light on the body), , ((dark outlines)), by taran fiddler, by dagasi, by Foxovh, (sharp focus), (masterpiece, 8k, 4k,raw photo, warm lighting, best quality, hi res, high resolution, high details, ultra realistic, absurd res), (human on anthro), creampie, massive cum, (butt grab:1.6, pov sex, pov, sweaty body:1.2)

    Negative prompt:
    (bad_hands-5:1.3), (feral:1.4), (worst quality, low quality:1.4, cub), text, watermark, blurry, cloned face, cropped, dehydrated, duplicate error, extra arms, extra fingers, extra legs, extra limbs, fused fingers jpeg, artifacts, low quality, lowres, malformed limbs, missing arms, missing legs, morbid, mutated hands, mutation, mutilated, out of frame, poorly drawn face, poorly drawn hands, signature text, too many fingers, ugly, username, watermark, worst quality, boring_e621, antlers, young, colored sclera, solo

    Steps: 30,Sampler: DPMSolverMultistepKarras++, CFG scale: 7.4, Seed: 4115136506,Size: 512x768, Model: bb95FurryMix_v110SE, VAE: None, LoRA: more_details

  • |
  • 0
  • 115 230 5 E

    pinasheep69 said:
    What model/prompts used?

    Here you go ;)

    female deer getting fucked from behind, bent over, anthro, duo, perfect eyes, long eyelashes, sexy, (deer), (red hair, long hair), brown fur, blue eyes, (dirndl:1.2, eyelashes, ((orgasm:1.5, (clenching teeth:0.5), roll up eyes, Pleasure, pure bliss)), (motion lines:1.5, moan:1.3), thigh highs, (sex, Penetration), (doggystyle), BREAK (detailed background:1.3), (cinematic lighting), detailed ambient light, (detailed lighting), (ambient light on the body), , ((dark outlines)), by taran fiddler, by dagasi, by Foxovh, (sharp focus), (masterpiece, 8k, 4k,raw photo, warm lighting, best quality, hi res, high resolution, high details, ultra realistic, absurd res), (human on anthro), creampie, massive cum, (butt grab:1.6, pov sex, pov, sweaty body:1.2)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #12078
    189 339 2 E
    post #12045
    223 403 3 E
    post #12060
    651 1.2k 5 E
    post #12049
    120 202 2 E
    post #12063
    43 48 1 E
    post #11928
    211 405 1 E
    post #12054
    14 27 1 Q
    post #8848
    58 106 1 E
    post #12052
    300 577 3 E
    post #12058
    60 89 1 Q

    Man not only are they eyes incredible, they're accurate too.

    Did you inpaint them or did they generate like that?

  • |
  • 5
  • post #12036
    19 33 1 E

    Heh. Replace the tentacles with snakes next time, this looks like it could turn into a good medusa picture.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #12034
    54 64 1 E
    post #12044
    479 955 5 E
    post #12041
    23 23 1 S
    post #11590
    94 162 1 E
    post #11498
    95 171 1 E

    I love the finish on this one, which kind of prompts did you use for get such amazing result?. any Lora use, or inpainting?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #11136
    62 73 6 S
    post #12026
    56 62 5 Q

    Love this! I think the only thing that would make it better is if the sky was red or pinkish! I think it would fit so much better! But either way a heck of a nice picture!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #9089
    29 75 2 E

    something about the fact that there are 8 "ugly"s in the negative protion, which is also significantly larger than the positive portion is... well, it says something

  • |
  • 0
  • post #12026
    56 62 5 Q
    post #11895
    130 287 7 E

    dythul said:
    If you're so willing to get and post the prompt when asked why not save everyone's time, including yourself, and just post it in the first place?

    The prompts are too long for me to post in the description. Why be a dick about it?

  • |
  • 2
  • 115 230 5 E
    post #11863
    114 161 2 E
    post #12026
    56 62 5 Q
    post #12026
    56 62 5 Q
    post #11918
    81 132 2 E
    post #11930
    148 271 1 E
    post #12026
    56 62 5 Q
    post #11967
    68 84 4 E
    post #12010
    92 139 1 E
    post #11980
    55 84 2 E

    yalonip said:
    How close would you say your original sketch is to the final image? How did you ever have problems with it staying too close to the sketch?

    So I think the key if I were to do it again would be to keep it simple. I did a little bit of shading and tried to make the couch more like a mimic where it was morphing to entrap the kobold. The model didn't really seem to care about that stuff. What I noticed was that it seemed to use faces/mouths as reference points and they didn't seem to shift all that much in between seeds. However, the pose was a different story, I originally had it in a more sitting up straight position, but the model seemed to be more flexible and consistently did other poses. Doing the art first really just instructed the model where the mimic's mouth was and where the kobold's head would be. After that, I think I could have spent less time on the body and just run through a bunch of different iterations instead. Once you get a post you like but it's not quite there, you can run some variation seeds to fine tune it. Flat colors and clean linework seem to work well.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #7731
    61 108 2 E

    He's lovely, anyone reading this with the capability, more goat moms/sons etc please, gotes 4ever

  • |
  • 0
  • post #11967
    68 84 4 E

    vwulf said:
    We need more "Charr"s on this site, lovely piece, could do without the piss IMO tho.

    i made it just for you ;)

  • |
  • 2
  • post #11991
    78 154 2 E

    *Jaw Dropped* She is gorgeous, I love the outfit, the scale patten fits her fluff so well, the proportions are phenomenal. I hope we can get more like this, 12 out of 10.

    PS. Her hands could use some work, but those are the hardest to get right, everything else is amazing.

  • |
  • 7
  • post #7238
    98 190 1 E

    It would be interesting to see a set of a few consecutive images storytelling the day this needy wolf came across two young, benevolent and naughty human girls...

  • |
  • -1
  • post #11929
    147 294 2 E

    Really amazing!
    The tail direction and positioning is a bit weird, and it should be fixed, but the image is great!
    Both the pose and her face are very sexy!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #11933
    117 185 4 E
    post #11937
    100 158 1 E

    There is an extra body between her tail and her right wing; something is wrong!
    Really a shame, it would have been a great image otherwise.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #11993
    53 63 1 S
    post #11895
    130 287 7 E

    ask for prompt and ye shall receive.

    If you're so willing to get and post the prompt when asked why not save everyone's time, including yourself, and just post it in the first place?

  • |
  • -6
  • post #11931
    53 73 1 Q
    post #11406
    50 94 4 E

    raeandlucia said:
    Would it be possible to get a non-explicit version of this? I'd love to have it as a background!

    Changing prompt to SFW result in completely different image :(

  • |
  • 0
  • post #5360
    54 75 4 Q

    ballters90 said:
    i wish it was real!

    Would be nice if she and many more were real. It would be front page news for a long time. Fans would come out in droves and crazies would too.

  • |
  • 0