Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #51612
    42 71 2 E
    post #51510
    146 187 3 E
    151 226 4 E
    post #51600
    57 72 2 E
    post #50947
    103 173 7 E
    post #50947
    103 173 7 E
    post #51585
    71 135 1 E
    post #51465
    55 74 4 E
    post #51466
    52 84 1 E
    post #51467
    52 72 1 E
    post #51470
    101 177 3 E
    post #51471
    50 78 1 E
    post #51472
    42 76 1 E
    post #51476
    50 73 2 E
    post #51477
    63 105 1 E
    post #51478
    44 55 1 E
    post #51479
    42 64 1 E
    post #51405
    33 56 1 Q
    post #51560
    105 181 1 E
    post #51591
    117 175 2 E
    post #51579
    51 59 1 S
    post #51591
    117 175 2 E
    post #2714
    137 242 1 E
    post #51451
    113 169 2 E
    post #51104
    235 418 2 E
    post #51574
    102 167 1 E
    7 7 4 Q

    That scene would be better if that heart suddenly transforms into teat gun like it was on an old DOS game Redneck Rampage

  • |
  • 1
  • post #51465
    55 74 4 E

    goldanthrowolf said:
    Amazing how utterly realistic this whole set it, yeesh! Crazy to think how good this stuff has gotten.

    Agreed. I feel like some of my gens rub on one of the rules for posting photorealistic renders. Anthros are pretty safe, fortunately.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #51456
    36 53 9 E
    post #51545
    97 166 4 E
    post #51536
    61 91 4 E
    post #51536
    61 91 4 E
    post #51545
    97 166 4 E
    post #51456
    36 53 9 E

    Could you make a male Shiny Charizard, getting railed by a feral male Arcanine?

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • 151 226 4 E
    post #51545
    97 166 4 E
    post #51545
    97 166 4 E
    post #51218
    132 214 2 E
    post #48786
    43 68 1 E
    post #26972
    36 38 1 S
    post #51536
    61 91 4 E
    post #51215
    46 43 3 S

    technical-grid said:
    I though she was on a beach untill i looked closer 💀

    I thought that too until it's like... "oh those poor people just got deleted by a floofy tail". helluva way to go though.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #51434
    146 208 4 Q
    post #51510
    146 187 3 E
    post #51525
    40 60 2 E
    post #51376
    56 83 4 E

    kenzofrostpaw said:
    I really Like Brian and you did an amazing job on all 3 of them. I hope to see more Brian art from you. Thank you.

    Aw, thank you! I'll make sure to do some more.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #51455
    49 77 2 E
    post #51465
    55 74 4 E
    post #51536
    61 91 4 E
    post #50630
    88 112 1 E
    post #51525
    40 60 2 E

    Looks like he was a bit of a grower and she just realized what she's in for.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #51454
    21 57 1 Q
    post #51459
    28 35 1 E
    7 7 4 Q
    post #51448
    139 238 1 E
    post #50492
    35 46 6 E
    post #51462
    27 47 1 E
    post #51216
    4 15 1 Q
    post #21952
    132 188 3 E

    badwolf1 said:
    Looks older than princess material so ?
    My queen.
    And she is apparently suggesting she be serviced.

    Doesn't matter, if she's a princess you just gotta make her a queen 👑

  • |
  • 0
  • post #49713
    83 133 2 E
    post #51073
    114 178 1 E
    post #51146
    54 66 4 E

    adarjoor said:
    Is Chunie doing AI art now or was the AI just trained on his art style?

    Of course, that's AI trained on his style.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #51470
    101 177 3 E
    post #8263
    44 84 1 E

    This is example why neural network generators aka "AI" can't draw good rope bondage. "Ropes" look like clinging wet noodles, zero knots is present or zero effect on figure is shown. That's bad even if I igonore callistic side of the picture.

    There are layers upon layer of complexity in situation and implementation which even half of humans cannot comprehend, but may understand intuitively.
    And even if director would understand that and somehow will explain every detail and knot to generator, most likely generator wouldn't "understand" it, because it wouldn't be able to find analogs among stuff it was educated on. And most of bondage stuff, that is not photography, is wrong too.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #50947
    103 173 7 E
    63 95 2 E

    hummelfisch said:
    Setting? Looks awesome

    All of the metadata should still be there to view if you save it, the only cases where it'd be missing are if I ever make minor tweaks with photoshop since that will scrub them when I save it.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #51447
    117 209 2 E
    post #50821
    30 38 2 E
    post #51451
    113 169 2 E
    post #51268
    44 54 2 S
    post #50477
    150 282 2 E
    post #51445
    39 47 1 S
    post #51378
    56 86 1 E
    post #51447
    117 209 2 E
    post #51434
    146 208 4 Q