Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #170008
    256 399 10 E

    furryranch said:
    But how does she have a picture, of the picture we're looking at??

    And a picture of the picture within it!

  • |
  • 2
  • post #170080
    360 574 7 E
    post #170091
    65 75 6 E

    Hitoner has sky-rocketed to become one of my favourite on-going series

  • |
  • 2
  • 8 11 2 E

    No, it's not quite Mila but she is cute and quite good in her own right!

  • |
  • 0
  • 125 205 2 E

    Oh come on! That watermark is just TOO intrusive right there. (I only complain because I love it.)

  • |
  • 6
  • post #169997
    103 147 1 E
    post #150464
    92 168 6 E

    Ah yes, the completely debunked myth that people refuse to let die. Yeah, there are similarities. No, it was not a copy, a ripoff, or anything like what this poster claims.

    In 1994, Takayuki Matsutani, the president of Osamu Tezuka’s production company Tezuka Productions, said:

    Quite a few staff of our company saw a preview of “The Lion King,” discussed this subject and came to the conclusion that you cannot avoid having these similarities as long as you use animals as characters and try to draw images out of them.

    Quote is from Huffpost but I've seen it other places too, that was just the easiest to find with a search.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #148480
    84 101 3 S
    post #170043
    5 5 1 Q
    post #170093
    121 151 1 S

    n n

    Member

    Oh yes! more of the super adorable husky ❤️❤️❤️ :D Thank you!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #163492
    69 43 6 S

    dodgey_roger said:
    What about the male fox not having a tail at all? Lol

    I didn’t even notice that fox tail on the horse until people pointed it out in the comments. And as for the male fox… let’s just imagine that his tail hangs to the right, i.e. behind his body :)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #123484
    330 548 1 E
    post #170039
    98 158 1 E

    Wow, super picture—awesome! Is it possible to get this in the "mega" form too? Only if you can, of course. ^^

  • |
  • 3
  • 8 11 2 E

    I think she is hinting at something. I need to continue observing some more of this behavior

  • |
  • 0
  • post #145288
    26 16 4 S
    post #167801
    44 49 4 S
    post #169987
    108 108 3 S
    post #169989
    86 120 10 Q
    post #170025
    74 108 2 E
    post #169290
    119 187 1 E
    post #118486
    163 310 1 E
    post #170044
    23 25 1 S
    post #151633
    54 38 9 S
    40 41 1 E
    7 12 1 E
    post #170053
    167 274 4 E
    13 12 2 Q
    post #170057
    30 62 1 E
    post #170065
    309 496 2 E
    post #170080
    360 574 7 E
    post #170086
    100 150 1 E
    post #167819
    180 360 1 E
    post #170013
    21 17 2 S
    post #170080
    360 574 7 E
    post #170069
    7 16 2 S
    post #170063
    160 239 3 E
    post #170063
    160 239 3 E
    post #164364
    2 7 1 E
    28 27 1 E
    post #170055
    37 27 2 S
    post #167340
    309 516 1 E
    post #163492
    69 43 6 S
    post #170033
    68 94 1 S

    n n

    Member

    ❤️🐺 Hunks like these don't even have to ask

  • |
  • 2
  • post #163623
    80 149 4 E

    Only OG’s remember when dithering like this was necessary for systems limited to 16-bit color, limited space to store images, or limited bandwidth to load them (think 56kbps or less). This would look so silky smooth on a CRT.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #170030
    165 262 1 E
    post #170023
    153 235 1 E
    post #170020
    48 72 2 E
    post #167720
    290 469 7 E

    lionxld said:
    So you used Photoshop to stitch them together in post-production?

    You can do that or blob them in with any art program (ms paint is enough) and a couple of moderate-denoise inpaints to preserve a pose/composition. I mostly do the latter, but either way the last step is a soft inpainting pass to minimize stitches/halos. If you need anything else feel free to pm me.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #152947
    33 19 3 S
    post #165330
    36 51 2 E
    post #155685
    472 798 8 E
    post #166256
    20 26 4 S
    post #170017
    244 421 6 E
    post #157687
    298 500 9 Q
    post #170062
    151 258 3 E

    is this the musky gamer-girl wolf waifu the future has promised us?

  • |
  • 3
  • post #166204
    33 12 2 S

    Your stuff is so good, it's so lovely the breath of fresh air you bring. :)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #170080
    360 574 7 E
    post #169921
    39 30 13 S
    post #168645
    36 57 1 E

    Honestly the redesign makes way more sense for the character description than the original design. Pretty girls who have time to groom and care for their appearance don’t work as solo mercenaries sleeping in the cockpit of their ships for whom more than basic hygiene is a luxury.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #170080
    360 574 7 E
    post #170054
    27 28 1 S
    post #169724
    213 337 1 E
    post #169743
    63 52 3 S
    post #169744
    43 46 6 Q
    post #169774
    26 33 3 S
    post #169820
    288 472 6 E
    post #169921
    39 30 13 S

    Wow.. now that is utterly impressive! I also used Gemini, but I only got the medium level teir, mostly for storage and all that. I'll have to play around, get some more info!

  • |
  • 1
  • 73 99 2 E
    post #170063
    160 239 3 E
    post #170062
    151 258 3 E
    post #170042
    83 127 2 Q

    squishface said:
    Well done Vader-sa er uh I mean Vartasaur

    I kinda get the hate for AI when it's obvious which artist's work got scraped for the models.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #170037
    109 171 1 E
    post #170053
    167 274 4 E

    Yay! Another anteater pic! They are always so pretty and hot! Love that amazing tongue!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #170061
    25 38 1 E
    post #169125
    63 102 1 Q