Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #152399
    280 439 3 E

    Большие кошки как всегда великолепны. Хотелось бы увидеть больше контента с ними.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #152432
    309 580 4 E
    post #152432
    309 580 4 E
    post #152397
    264 436 4 E
    post #152328
    75 110 2 E
    post #152371
    135 208 3 E

    This is clearly what Spike should have grown into. I hate what they did to my boy in the show

  • |
  • 4
  • post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    fixxor said:
    I generally agree but it would be nice if uploaders would get some time to fix errors and submit a replacement instead oft an instant delete.

    Nah man, giving the director 24 hours to upload a fixed version to merge is too much trouble, they need to insta delete the picture with a vague references to an issue with the background.

    Also, don't get me started on them deleting pictures of characters that they randomly decide are underage, with zero evidence, while leaving up hundreds of pictures of a character who is canonically 8 years old

  • |
  • 6
  • post #152384
    38 39 6 S
    post #152346
    21 34 2 E
    post #152397
    264 436 4 E
    post #152346
    21 34 2 E
    post #152408
    153 213 10 E
    post #152373
    371 449 10 E

    "terraraptor"Heh a lot of the other rawgen images had them using umbrellas. I was trying to prompt against it since that didn't feel very medievalish.

    Maybe you could make it a regional thing, or even a class thing? As in, people from a certain place prefer one or the other, or the umbrellas are just pricy and used mainly in higher circles.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #152387
    45 70 3 E
    post #151786
    236 361 3 E

    This is incredible, the detail on the sheath and precum drip is such a perfect touch. What model can do feline sheaths so well? This is impressive!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    A couple of my earlier posts of my Luphra'Nite girls were perfectly fine, from many people's obersvations, and I even corrected some mistakes. Still deleted, so like others, I simply started to not include fingers/eyes to get around that, just focusing on the anatomy.

    I'm considering posting my SFW Grok based images and little movies based on things. Even as glorious as they are, I'm sure SOMEONE will find a flaw in them, so I'm not going to put myself through that frustration again.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #152366
    96 167 2 E
    194 289 1 Q

    waah, I would really like to generate images with AI too, what site do you use to do it? *^*

  • |
  • 0
  • post #148971
    222 408 3 E

    djar-17 said:
    I don't use online services. I run Stable Diffusion locally on my PC.
    It's not that difficult to set up — you could install SD too, but you'll need a decent rig. Preferably 32 GB RAM and at least 8 GB of VRAM.

    And how do these programs work? Do you always have to enter negative and positive prompts to make the image look as beautiful as the one you made to achieve such a beautiful artistic style, and then subsequently enter very specific prompts to generate the image you want?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #131880
    106 170 4 E
    post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    all my stuff gets deleted. they kept my old sucky stuff though. =p
    imo there should be a time and user engagement threshold. if a post hits enough up-doots it should get to stay. most people wont see a slight defect in the background. if we compare to real art this stuff is way better then 90% of it. the point of this website is to host art we all like and enjoy. with that mind set i see no point in removing something people clearly like over a tiny defect. there is a replace feature. why not just tell the artist "hey these are the problems" then let them replace it in the future (assuming they got enough up-doots). this website makes nothing, it hosts. driving away creators is not a healthy long term plan for this place. with that said i do still like this website. it just means im not going to upload my art here anymore. it makes me sad i dont feel welcome in a place i use everyday.

    Updated

  • |
  • 6
  • post #152425
    245 418 3 E
    post #152314
    295 500 3 E

    Saw this and was going to make a Divinity reference but it seems I didn't have to lmao. I hope Larian doesn't shy away from adult content.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #152327
    388 673 4 E
    post #152330
    291 530 2 E
    post #152332
    214 391 4 E

    skillyzee said:
    Hmm... how much are gym memberships?

    I'm asking for a friend.

    I'm sure you'd get a discount since you're acting as equipment for "cardio" training

  • |
  • 3
  • post #152362
    166 243 3 E

    That's a scary look... there's going to be no rest until she passes out

  • |
  • 2
  • post #152376
    308 488 8 E
    post #152378
    188 331 1 E
    post #152410
    246 421 1 E
    15 15 1 E
    post #152402
    135 173 3 E

    Thank you sooo much for your Cleo posts, tohot2pimp!
    Defenetly need more of her ❤️

  • |
  • 2
  • 65 83 1 Q
    post #152317
    54 33 3 Q
    post #128698
    244 394 4 E
    post #152366
    96 167 2 E

    DAMN! AI is becoming more and more convincing every day.
    It looks like you drew this by hand. It’s beautiful!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #152393
    569 1.0k 4 E
    post #152407
    102 125 3 Q
    post #152408
    153 213 10 E
    post #152397
    264 436 4 E
    post #152408
    153 213 10 E
    13 12 2 E

    drla said:
    You're cooking up some good stuff with the LoRA, unfortunately it struggles with faces when they're too small in the image, but it's easy to fix with "mask only" inpainting. If you need help with that, drop by the #gen-help channel in the official Discord (just make sure to spoiler feral content is you post any).

    Thanks! I'll take a look at what I can fix and join the Discord, appreciate it!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #152301
    15 11 3 S
    post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    kalethorebiter said:
    Oh hey! We're fast because we have a team keeping on top of things :P

    I just want to add that janitors don't take pleasure on deleting artworks, and we are all well aware of the frustration. Most of the team (if not all) has went through it too.

    We are a friendly bunch though, and ready to help directors to fix their gens to meet our quality standards.

    I definitely appreciate the need for quality standards but I'm not sure the guiding philosophy is spelled out or understood the same by all. My opinion is that it should weed out submissions with issues that will likely be noticed by a significant percentage of viewers and ruin their enjoyment. It bugs me to be looking through a CivitAI post and half the images have anatomy flaws. I don't have to worry about that here. But if the issue is an eye isn't perfectly clear when viewed at absurdres and the post has 50 favorites on it by the time it's up for approval/rejection, maybe it's not that big a deal.

  • |
  • 15
  • post #152402
    135 173 3 E
    post #152328
    75 110 2 E
    post #152302
    265 476 1 E
    post #152301
    15 11 3 S
    post #152291
    48 69 2 E
    post #152396
    153 231 1 E
    post #152248
    164 258 2 E
    post #152400
    204 259 3 Q

    gridanon said:
    Ha! Very nice work here DarkElipse. Excellent expressions. The dialog is a nice touch too. And I'm impressed the cards turned out so well, I'm guessing that's an edit rather than the AI actually doing them that well? It's great to see you do multi-character scenes so nicely and I hope we get to see more of them from you!

    I edited the cards manually, AI cards are complete nonsense

    Updated

  • |
  • 5
  • post #152400
    204 259 3 Q

    Ha! Very nice work here DarkElipse. Excellent expressions. The dialog is a nice touch too. And I'm impressed the cards turned out so well, I'm guessing that's an edit rather than the AI actually doing them that well? It's great to see you do multi-character scenes so nicely and I hope we get to see more of them from you!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #152376
    308 488 8 E

    auykac said:
    Am I the only one noticing the entire top half the body is missing and it’s like the heads attached to where the mid abdomen would be? 👀

    Dick don't care! 😍

    Lol jk, it is a bit odd, I agree

  • |
  • -4
  • post #152087
    40 41 3 Q
    post #152398
    3 23 3 E

    boxelby945 said:
    I might try and generate some sheen (solo + with Fatigue) later. Just need to get some good prompts in for them in NovelAI to keep the style right.

    Gotcha. You have been awesomely good to be true to their style on all your posts, so it makes sense.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #152400
    204 259 3 Q
    post #152398
    3 23 3 E

    chastitycoyote said:
    No Sheen? 8-)

    I might try and generate some sheen (solo + with Fatigue) later. Just need to get some good prompts in for them in NovelAI to keep the style right.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #152398
    3 23 3 E
    post #152373
    371 449 10 E

    anormalpasserby said:
    It looks that Midrian people usually use coats instead of umbrella.

    Heh a lot of the other rawgen images had them using umbrellas. I was trying to prompt against it since that didn't feel very medievalish.

    teacc said:
    And the Snek don't care at all.
    *already got a very sexy hood.

    it's real difficult to add details to a blurry background character in AI, so let's go with your version ^^

  • |
  • 2
  • post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    Oh hey! We're fast because we have a team keeping on top of things :P

    I just want to add that janitors don't take pleasure on deleting artworks, and we are all well aware of the frustration. Most of the team (if not all) has went through it too.

    We are a friendly bunch though, and ready to help directors to fix their gens to meet our quality standards.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    gridanon said:
    Try having a gen taken down because "that water in the background doesn't have a consistent horizon line"

    But really though, the quality standards serve an important role for preventing low quality spam and they're what make e6ai the best quality AI booru. Go look at uncensored CiviAI, or Rule 34 XXX, or Rule 34 Paheal to see the alternative. It's not just taking down bad gens, but also making sure that the genners who regularly post gens here are the kind willing to put time and effort into fixing issues.

    This kind of generative AI puts power in the hands of people which is a good thing, but it also empowers them to create nigh-limitless slop. It's better for a gen to be down for a while to fix issues than to be lost forever in a sea of slop.

    Plus the mod team are only human too and just as prone to mistakes so they should be cut some slack the same way you'd want them to cut you some slack sometimes.

    The quality standards can be frustrating but it's better than the alternative.

    Good points. I still remember a generation being deleted because the character looked young, despite it being a high angle and the character possessing breasts large enough to orbit around. It was reinstated after an appeal (thank you), but sometimes it would be nice if a "shoot first, ask later" approach wasn't taken sometimes.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    silverlynx said:
    Coming in here, talking sense... Can't you see we're trying to have a rage-fest? XD

    Give him some slack, hes been up 24 hours fixing 2 gens with errors and finally fixed them

  • |
  • 1
  • post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    gridanon said:
    Try having a gen taken down because "that water in the background doesn't have a consistent horizon line"

    But really though, the quality standards serve an important role for preventing low quality spam and they're what make e6ai the best quality AI booru. Go look at uncensored CiviAI, or Rule 34 XXX, or Rule 34 Paheal to see the alternative. It's not just taking down bad gens, but also making sure that the genners who regularly post gens here are the kind willing to put time and effort into fixing issues.

    This kind of generative AI puts power in the hands of people which is a good thing, but it also empowers them to create nigh-limitless slop. It's better for a gen to be down for a while to fix issues than to be lost forever in a sea of slop.

    Plus the mod team are only human too and just as prone to mistakes so they should be cut some slack the same way you'd want them to cut you some slack sometimes.

    The quality standards can be frustrating but it's better than the alternative.

    Coming in here, talking sense... Can't you see we're trying to have a rage-fest? XD

  • |
  • 5
  • post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    fixxor said:
    I generally agree but it would be nice if uploaders would get some time to fix errors and submit a replacement instead oft an instant delete.

    There is the option to run em by on the chan's Discord and get critique for what showstoppers it might have. So, there is a way, Few use it.

    Requesting a replacement is the option those are left with that wont.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #152376
    308 488 8 E

    auykac said:
    Am I the only one noticing the entire top half the body is missing and it’s like the heads attached to where the mid abdomen would be? 👀

    You clearly have not seen a dog wash her pussy before thats what it looks like. There body looks like top half is missing 🤣😂

  • |
  • 2
  • post #152359
    318 670 2 E
    post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    gridanon said:
    Try having a gen taken down because "that water in the background doesn't have a consistent horizon line"

    But really though, the quality standards serve an important role for preventing low quality spam and they're what make e6ai the best quality AI booru. Go look at uncensored CiviAI, or Rule 34 XXX, or Rule 34 Paheal to see the alternative. It's not just taking down bad gens, but also making sure that the genners who regularly post gens here are the kind willing to put time and effort into fixing issues.

    This kind of generative AI puts power in the hands of people which is a good thing, but it also empowers them to create nigh-limitless slop. It's better for a gen to be down for a while to fix issues than to be lost forever in a sea of slop.

    Plus the mod team are only human too and just as prone to mistakes so they should be cut some slack the same way you'd want them to cut you some slack sometimes.

    The quality standards can be frustrating but it's better than the alternative.

    I generally agree but it would be nice if uploaders would get some time to fix errors and submit a replacement instead oft an instant delete.

  • |
  • 9
  • post #152388
    158 228 1 E

    Damn DRLa, all your gens are impressive. Neat to see you do one with so many characters like this too!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    Try having a gen taken down because "that water in the background doesn't have a consistent horizon line"

    But really though, the quality standards serve an important role for preventing low quality spam and they're what make e6ai the best quality AI booru. Go look at uncensored CiviAI, or Rule 34 XXX, or Rule 34 Paheal to see the alternative. It's not just taking down bad gens, but also making sure that the genners who regularly post gens here are the kind willing to put time and effort into fixing issues.

    This kind of generative AI puts power in the hands of people which is a good thing, but it also empowers them to create nigh-limitless slop. It's better for a gen to be down for a while to fix issues than to be lost forever in a sea of slop.

    Plus the mod team are only human too and just as prone to mistakes so they should be cut some slack the same way you'd want them to cut you some slack sometimes.

    The quality standards can be frustrating but it's better than the alternative.

  • |
  • 11
  • post #152376
    308 488 8 E

    Am I the only one noticing the entire top half the body is missing and it’s like the heads attached to where the mid abdomen would be? 👀

  • |
  • 3
  • post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    silverlynx said:
    You think that's bad. Try being the one who worked on it, felt good about the quality, took the time to tag everything in sight, posted and got compliments already from a couple people who liked it, and then it gets taken down because of a non-existent flaw that only got 'noticed' because you decided to upload it in a reasonably high resolution.

    Feel this to my core. :(

  • |
  • 10
  • post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    You think that's bad. Try being the one who worked on it, felt good about the quality, took the time to tag everything in sight, posted and got compliments already from a couple people who liked it, and then it gets taken down because of a non-existent flaw that only got 'noticed' because you decided to upload it in a reasonably high resolution.

  • |
  • 27
  • post #152365
    19 16 1 S
    post #152383
    145 58 28 S

    dubies said:
    Mods gotta chill... they're picky as all hell; not satisfied over a stray hair, but a vagoober looking like blue waffle is okay... c'mon...

    celeste_shamrock said:
    Yeah, the thumb on the right hand was 2-degrees out of alignment with the rest of the fingers. FLAWED! DELETE NAU!!!!!

    Thank god; thought it was just me. All these tiny errors would be totally looked over on non-AI works on e621.

  • |
  • 14