Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #177029
    28 68 4 E
    post #177206
    52 77 1 E
    post #177220
    37 30 3 S

    Teejay

    Member

    I can not tell how much I love this one.
    This made my day!!

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #177215
    181 251 3 E

    badwolf1

    Member

    There should be another category for the quality art so people don't have to waste time sifting through all junk..

  • |
  • -1
    •
    post #177108
    98 160 2 Q
    post #177210
    94 114 1 Q
    post #177025
    170 168 20 E

    svir

    Member

    terraraptor said:
    Then it's off to the inpaint mines with local models for awhile as you customize and refine each segment of the image piece by piece.

    What are you using ComfyUI, krita, SwarmUI?

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #177190
    120 118 5 S
    post #177189
    116 150 1 Q
    post #177025
    170 168 20 E

    TerraRaptor

    Privileged

    svir said:
    Do you have a video or explanation of how you generate such images with different characters, or is this a trade secret?

    You basically have to use a non-local, powerful remote model such as google's as a compositional starting point. The detail quality isn't great, nor is the art style, but it's pretty good for getting the characters vaguely positioned as prompted, and close-enough to desired appearance (so like, the "bones" of the image). Then it's off to the inpaint mines with local models for awhile as you customize and refine each segment of the image piece by piece. That last part takes awhile and it's why my image posts here are spaced apart by a few days, though that could also be because my computer is so slow lol.

    EDIT: Btw I shouldn't have said "have to". There's more than one way to go about it, and I've used a few different approaches throughout e6ai. For workflows that are 100% local beginning to end, there's regional prompting, or sketch inpainting, or generating singulars and plopping/stitching them into place.

    Updated

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #177146
    200 326 4 E
    post #176402
    75 95 4 Q
    post #176895
    99 122 10 Q
    post #177150
    38 58 2 E
    post #176816
    263 443 4 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    deciem said:
    Once you see the pussy like a mouth and the balls as eyes, you can't see it any other way than a face.

    People are mad for good reason😐

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #176807
    112 124 3 Q
    post #173785
    129 218 1 E

    HalouDoval

    Member

    The ring in his mouth looks like it isn't attached to the strap. But other than that, this image looks fantastic.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #176798
    68 95 2 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    It only seems small because everyone else on this website has baguette sized cocks. Its actually pretty normal, and she is perfect

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #176794
    135 170 1 E
    post #176780
    78 128 1 E
    post #177098
    88 157 3 E
    post #177157
    184 265 6 E
    post #177006
    237 387 3 E

    En Res

    Member

    I haven't visited this site in too long. I'm glad you're back!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #135621
    263 442 3 E

    ihaveihaveihaveporn

    Member

    alaskan_huzky said:
    That is not Loona.

    we are in the early stages of local video generation, especially FURRY video generation. Don't expect prompt adherence to be perfect. I'd like to remind you that there are virtually no human beings who can create furry animations with this degree of lighting/texture realism

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #177157
    184 265 6 E
    post #177177
    69 106 1 E
    post #176579
    75 115 4 E

    Akikeda

    Member

    okt said:
    I'll just edit out the tiny human. Nice gen.

    Fortunately technology makes that a piece of cake. Happy you like it otherwise.

    furrylion said:
    I'd crawl into his sheath and stay there

    I guess that's an option ;)

    markrhey said:
    Slight size difference

    Probably just an illusion caused by the angle

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #177025
    170 168 20 E

    svir

    Member

    Do you have a video or explanation of how you generate such images with different characters, or is this a trade secret?

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #177176
    53 35 4 S
    post #177150
    38 58 2 E
    post #177176
    53 35 4 S
    post #176579
    75 115 4 E
    post #177175
    99 125 6 E
    post #177146
    200 326 4 E
    post #175984
    51 45 4 S
    post #177166
    220 327 1 E
    post #177162
    204 319 2 E
    post #177170
    88 89 1 S
    3 4 1 E
    post #177162
    204 319 2 E
    post #176062
    47 47 2 S
    post #175984
    51 45 4 S
    post #177138
    41 52 1 S
    post #177158
    43 66 1 E

    Nagiman90

    Member

    Thank Arceus they installed the new fun toilet in the mens room. It was getting boring using just the old porcelain ones.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #177157
    184 265 6 E
    post #177025
    170 168 20 E

    Blake81

    Member

    terraraptor said:
    That's mostly human. I say "mostly" cause I run my text thru spelling and grammar check, which is AI, and sometimes it'll suggest a cleaner or more coherent way to phrase something. Or if I'm struggling with coming up with a made up, invented word (For instance "obdurite" mentioned on post #159340), I may ask for plausible suggestions. A lot of my picts start out with a lore draft, and the associated pict comes later. Raegul, for instance, has been an internal footnote for awhile before being featured.

    That's still about 99% human to me, IMHO. I also write and use stuff like Grammarly, so yeah. I feel AI struggles much more with writing than with art.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #176364
    101 107 4 S
    post #177142
    350 592 2 E
    post #141079
    87 120 2 E
    post #175736
    83 110 3 E
    post #160782
    42 39 1 Q
    post #177146
    200 326 4 E

    WhereWolf

    Member

    Another surprise attack by a female migrated down from Van Cougar Island. I have a feeling this one will go unreported...

    So where is this? You know, so I can avoid it. Sure.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #171862
    169 295 2 E
    post #172503
    176 310 1 E

    sealofharps

    Member

    What this is niice .

    I think I'll check frosting ai out some time.

    Nice work ❤️

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177042
    177 265 2 E
    post #123491
    272 448 6 E
    post #172229
    114 182 2 E
    post #177121
    74 115 1 E
    post #165191
    58 99 1 E
    post #166130
    65 115 2 E
    post #164482
    75 115 2 E

    sealofharps

    Member

    Handsome and majestic 👀 ❤️

    No one man should have all that power✨️

  • |
  • 0
    •
    22 12 1 E
    post #177148
    25 28 1 Q
    post #177091
    115 181 2 E

    zoerz

    Member

    lasciviouslupine said:
    The only appropriate use for foxes.

    And 'rarely taken care of'? Werewolf ass gets eaten all the time.

    That's the spirit.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #176988
    116 143 4 E

    RedPanda

    Privileged

    chastitycoyote said:
    Chair is from the other side, HR is Human Resources - in the US a HR person is the one whos job is managing all the hires/fires/intake.

    Desk seems backwards, but its the employee side of the table where you do the computer stuff at like job intake "paperwork".

    There are several visual issues with the chair. The point you raised is the first one; Even your argument is rendered useless by the other points. Secondly, the table is against the wall, leaving no room for the chair. Thirdly, if the table were to have a back panel, the chair would end up positioned inside the table itself.

    I would suggest removing the chair from the image entirely. Alternatively, you could just remove the backrest, allowing the lower section to pass as a stool. Unfortunately, AI struggles to get spatial relationships right.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177042
    177 265 2 E
    post #74632
    57 80 4 E

    Q-Player

    Member

    Lori enjoying what she loves most and receiving it where she loves it most! Simply perfect!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177127
    42 70 1 E

    dfY6C

    Privileged

    feels weird some stuff is uploaded but somehow unattributed to me.

    All tags are added by people to the extent of their knowledge and if they were uploading your stuff from /msdg/ rather than civit, then chances are they just simply didn't know who it was.

    Don't really have a desire to implement that.

    If you know which posts are yours, it's really easy to go in and tag those as yours. You can freely edit any of those posts, remove the anonymous- or unknown_director tag, and then add yours instead. Personally, I think it would be better to do it and have that out of the way for the convenience of users who want to find your stuff here. Obviously, that's still up to you in the end though.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177058
    150 217 3 E
    post #176987
    53 50 2 S
    post #177092
    189 283 2 E
    post #176935
    87 78 11 S

    medicineball

    Member

    My sense is this. What we call anthropomorphic foxes or horses or dogs or cats or other such bipedal beings that populate this site aren't anthropomorphic animals, but are zoomorphic humans. In other words, humans that have been altered to have traits similar to some cute (or sexy) animals. If you look at them you can tell the base being is human, so I don't think the subject couple is in violation of Leviticus ch 18.

    On another note, aside from mostly being about not having sex with relatives, Leviticus ch 18 also forbids you from having sex with a girl who's mensurating... Come on! We've all gotten drunk with our significant other at the wrong time of the month and the only harm was to our sheets! *sigh* Take it as you will.

    Love the romantic pieces like this on this site.

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #152658
    118 182 5 E

    furryhot1

    Member

    lolingtons77 said:
    I'm sorry, i didnt see this until way later looking back on old posts. If you do manage to see this, i made the Lora myslef.

    Ah, okay. I thought I could find it online. It came out really well 😉

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #176974
    54 62 4 E

    Q-Player

    Member

    srmalloy said:
    It's Natasha that has the 'cutouts' in the white markings on her face, not Lori; see https://e621.net/posts/1288361 with, left to right, Lori, Onyx, and Natasha.

    I know exactly what the three sisters look like—I've been familiar with Hardiman's art since 2007—but it's hard to get the AI to follow instructions and replicate a fur pattern 100%. I think I managed to get pretty close, though!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #174926
    153 268 3 E