Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #161037
    87 128 1 Q
    post #161088
    47 69 2 Q
    post #161073
    164 259 1 E
    post #161070
    110 158 2 Q
    post #161069
    173 259 1 E
    post #161012
    109 146 1 Q
    post #145806
    97 148 6 E

    Darn! This guy is a hot stuff.
    Would love to see him fuck and impregnate Nora or Chitsa.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #161097
    48 51 2 S

    Ooh, this look very good! I love the use of color here, her silhouette is so striking!

    Good job.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #161076
    181 260 1 E
    101 209 2 E
    post #139250
    67 104 1 Q
    post #161034
    381 667 3 E
    post #160804
    77 111 2 Q

    horsefucker5 said:
    You seem to be dealing with some static cling, miss

    It would be quite easy to relieve her from such a... serious problem...

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160903
    113 170 1 E
    post #160975
    181 291 1 E
    post #160996
    133 222 1 E
    post #161034
    381 667 3 E
    post #161064
    110 153 2 Q
    47 59 1 E
    post #161082
    108 141 2 E

    I recognise this Isabelle.
    Incredible how well AI can recreate even 3D render styles

  • |
  • 7
  • 1 9 1 E

    Is this getting downvoted because it has issues that I don’t see or because of the content? There is a blacklist in your settings for content that you don’t like to see.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #131309
    127 190 3 E
    post #160937
    78 70 4 S
    post #160670
    52 87 1 E
    post #152992
    222 382 1 E
    post #161056
    69 88 1 E
    post #104471
    180 236 3 E
    post #160971
    86 123 2 E
    96 154 2 E

    Insanely hot, but you can see both rows of teeth, showing that her mouth is closed

  • |
  • 4
  • post #160959
    33 69 1 E
    post #160957
    130 176 3 E
    post #160948
    235 403 1 E
    post #160944
    199 318 1 E

    I don't really mind broken anatomy like this, but that butt ain't quite connected to that torso in a realistic way

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160950
    304 519 4 E
    post #161064
    110 153 2 Q
    post #161013
    75 131 2 E
    post #161065
    117 178 1 E
    post #160921
    224 373 2 E
    post #161022
    133 231 1 E

    Woah! Back with a vengeance! Please tell there is more on the way because these are juicy.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #158453
    199 307 4 E

    As a professional Duchess appreciatior, I can confidently say that this is one of the best Duchess pictures ever. It really captures her character.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #161013
    75 131 2 E
    post #160934
    155 283 4 E
    post #159466
    221 321 2 E

    zheneric said:
    She really is a cat. Rolling around cutely while lying in a sunny spot on a soft couch

    😂

  • |
  • 1
  • post #159604
    121 198 2 E

    badwolf1 said:
    only 4.4mb but the detail.
    Follicles and pussy skin texture and the tiny pussy hairs.
    Yea, and everything else but My focus is the pussy/ass.

    Thank you! Loving this compression for smaller files

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160896
    171 236 3 E

    zheneric said:
    Cute!
    The way her expression works despite the realism is really inpressive

    Thank you! I feel I need something like an expression lora to get them more consistent 😂

    khamal said:
    Oh my floof!!

    😂

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160997
    151 266 1 E
    post #160530
    384 634 3 E
    post #160069
    240 377 6 E
    post #160695
    17 32 1 Q
    post #161004
    165 276 1 E
    post #160978
    262 386 6 E

    I think it's a spectrum between truly non-sexual artistic nudity, erotica and pornography. This image is artistic but also erotic. I guess erotica is just a better name for what usually is called 'softcore porn'. Basically something featuring nudity and sex appeal but tastefully done and without genital closeups or sex.

    On the other hand a lot of imagery which is explicitly pornographic still has artistic principles applied in its creation for aesthetic appeal. So I guess it's more about the intention, whether or not the main aim is to create art or to titillate, that defines whether or not something is pornography or art.

    I guess based on that definition you could argue this image is porn, since based on the story it's placing the viewer in the place of a voyeur while the subject is enjoying being an exhibitionist.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160974
    48 45 4 S

    Wish had gotten something like this rather than the dreck that was HW3

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160891
    104 145 3 E
    post #160934
    155 283 4 E
    post #160891
    104 145 3 E
    post #55868
    68 131 6 E
    post #160978
    262 386 6 E
    post #160974
    48 45 4 S
    post #156655
    249 344 7 E
    post #160992
    11 48 10 E

    I'd argue Evangelion has a broader message of if we have empathy with each other we may be able to reduce everyone's suffering or at least not contribute to it.

    She's gorgeous and her voice sounds smooth by the way.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160766
    67 78 1 S
    post #120318
    90 180 1 E

    I like how the "shiny"-ness is more than JUST a palette swap: he's actually shiny!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160957
    130 176 3 E
    post #160950
    304 519 4 E
    post #160214
    227 396 4 E
    38 25 2 Q

    okt said:
    Someday I'll know how a tattoo can be seen under the fur. Beautiful art, though.

    This is the first time I've seen something like this that's really well done.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160895
    186 291 3 E
    38 25 2 Q

    Okt

    Member

    Someday I'll know how a tattoo can be seen under the fur. Beautiful art, though.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160946
    180 358 1 E
    post #160978
    262 386 6 E
    post #160978
    262 386 6 E

    Okt

    Member

    Pornography is defined by the obsession over close ups of genital parts. Eroticism does not, or not that intensely. That's why the genital parts of a Greek statue was smooth for a woman, and small for a man. It was a non sexualized nudity. Vulgarity and obscenity also define pornography, but those are relative values now.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160978
    262 386 6 E
    post #160978
    262 386 6 E

    I agree, the line is the intent. Something like this pic is definitely artistic nudity and not pornography, because I don't believe it's meant to be sexual and instead showcase beauty, which it does VERY well!

    Also, she looks very tasteful! 😉

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160942
    78 112 1 E
    post #160696
    505 909 6 E

    nosuitnosoul said:
    So good~ ❤️‍🔥 But it is a little depressing that while Pokemon are obviously willing and emotionally mature enough to be partners with normal humans... if they have a choice they'd still like to get with ripped supermodels. 😑

    😦

  • |
  • 3