Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options

    Before commenting, read the how to comment guide.

    post #184457
    15 10 3 S
    Blacklisted

      boxelby945 Comment by a director on this post

      Member

      n_n said:
      Nice to have the lamb-pile back :)

      Some have ran away since but most of them are huddling in defiance of the British weather.

    • |
    • 6
    • post #184447
      77 86 1 S
      Blacklisted
        post #184357
        79 124 2 Q
        Blacklisted
          post #184501
          59 89 1 E
          Blacklisted
            post #184167
            140 219 7 E
            Show all comments
            Blacklisted

              Btw... By looking at some works on the site I am feeling like I am using some sort of orchish technics. Some others having a more clean results. I've tried to switch between models, experimented with upscalers/without them... Still the result is much worse. What am I doing wrong?!

            • |
            • 1
            • I don't know that I have ever seen an anatomically correct mare anthro before. Well done! She looks great!

            • |
            • 2
            • ilillililli said:
              Btw... By looking at some works on the site I am feeling like I am using some sort of orchish technics. Some others having a more clean results. I've tried to switch between models, experimented with upscalers/without them... Still the result is much worse. What am I doing wrong?!

              I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

              I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

            • |
            • 1
            • medicineball said:
              I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

              I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

              That's great to hear, thank you. Regarding the question, I mean that some things I generate work perfectly, without any inpainting or regeneration, but others, like this one, take a very long time to render. Most models probably aren't trained to do this, which is why the whole picture falls apart, even with a detailed sketch for Scribble. Idk, just trying to explain this to myself.

            • |
            • 1
            • Sanic

              Member

              ilillililli said:
              That's great to hear, thank you. Regarding the question, I mean that some things I generate work perfectly, without any inpainting or regeneration, but others, like this one, take a very long time to render. Most models probably aren't trained to do this, which is why the whole picture falls apart, even with a detailed sketch for Scribble. Idk, just trying to explain this to myself.

              I think this is an awesome piece. Not a lot of anatomically correct anthro mares, so I think it’s cool!

            • |
            • 1