Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #138505
    116 180 6 Q
    post #138535
    240 397 1 E
    post #138650
    144 221 2 E
    post #138733
    151 235 3 E
    post #138660
    150 218 1 Q
    post #138917
    155 277 4 E
    post #138891
    253 468 5 E
    112 156 5 E

    lolingtons77

    Member

    lickit69 said:
    How about female hyenas or female gnolls?

    Sounds good, bout to head out to work so after work ill make it happen!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #138759
    274 420 4 E
    post #138891
    253 468 5 E

    ilmpbx

    Member

    tobbe said:
    Very nice!
    I'd love to see more of her.

    There's a bunch of her on my socials, I don't upload here very much anymore.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #138910
    24 29 1 Q
    54 0 4 E
    post #138759
    274 420 4 E

    Master Debater

    Member

    Shit, I've been making similar renders on Perchance. [6~6]

    So, yeah, very hot.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #138759
    274 420 4 E
    post #138293
    34 60 29 S

    Lonewolven

    Member

    winserferret said:
    denying people human rights is a welcome one? so how do you force someone to give birth and raise a child they don't want to have

    There's a beautiful word that some people choose to ignore, it's called.... "accountability"

    They both know what they were doing, specially HER. it's totally implied in the comic and in this video. She was not attacked, nor r*ped or forced the baby on her. Ignorance, or not knowing is not an excuse not to be A C O U N T A B L E, for the baby. In fact taking you own words, the only "human" rights being denied here (by your logic), are the baby's.

    seriously the people who argues against the accountability logic... ugh.. never mind.

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
    •
    112 156 5 E
    112 156 5 E
    54 0 4 E
    post #138789
    189 319 1 E
    post #138849
    220 319 3 E
    post #138730
    162 272 1 E
    post #138882
    249 456 2 E
    post #138856
    211 337 2 E

    furryaddict

    Member

    I simple can't get enough photorealistic furrys. Keep up the incredible work!

  • |
  • 7
    •
    112 156 5 E
    post #138891
    253 468 5 E
    post #138774
    79 126 1 E

    airstep

    Member

    *somewhere below* drip drip, looks up..."huh i don't think it was suppose to rain"

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #138791
    234 356 8 E

    airstep

    Member

    It looks great but toothless is either too small or the human is too big.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #138712
    304 519 3 E
    post #138886
    87 152 2 S
    post #138846
    343 533 3 E

    LittleLemurLamprey

    Member

    blake81 said:
    As someone who's had the pleasure of touching a llama (well, actually an Alpaca) and that still owns a heavy winter coat made of their wool... man, you have no idea of just how soft they are.

    Can confirm. Alpacas are softer than cashmere.

  • |
  • 4
    •
    117 180 6 E

    MysticCheetah

    Member

    rhorimu said:
    Any chance for more of Vaporeon from behind like this? The detail looks really good!

    Thank you alot. In theory i have some nice alternates but theres a lack of other elements in these kinda „crotch_shots“ and i dont want to get flagged for spam. Do you have a wish or Idea that makes a Crotchshot more interesting?

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #137197
    175 320 2 E

    Totalynotaspy22

    Member

    this is amazing, I love those face expressions of pleasure and pain mixed with exhaustion on big kitties

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #138883
    84 111 2 Q

    ChastityCoyote

    Member

    Be careful, that left-handed ejection port might throw that hot brass somewhere sensitive. 8-P

  • |
  • 3
    •
    2 6 5 E

    Lerrmot

    Member

    tazzer said:
    This is the kind of behavior Stitch would do. Sucks that it's censored tho

    I can post the image of this uncensured

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #138883
    84 111 2 Q
    post #134197
    284 488 4 E
    post #138859
    65 100 3 E
    117 180 6 E

    rhorimu

    Member

    Any chance for more of Vaporeon from behind like this? The detail looks really good!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #101728
    96 127 1 E
    post #138852
    109 200 1 E
    post #138872
    58 66 1 S
    post #138841
    217 369 1 E
    post #66881
    150 228 5 E
    post #138620
    182 252 3 S

    knotanotherfurry

    Moderator

    r4nd0m said:
    She's so fluffy and beautiful, you nailed it 🩵.

    Thanks, it was fun to come up.

    j4cktr said:
    those eyes <3<3<3

    Yeah, green eyes are definitely a weakness of mine :D

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #134199
    317 548 4 E
    post #137992
    98 172 2 E
    post #138801
    205 329 2 E
    2 6 5 E

    Tazzer

    Member

    This is the kind of behavior Stitch would do. Sucks that it's censored tho

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #138081
    391 675 4 E
    post #118481
    231 412 2 E

    NonimousMate

    Member

    dodgey_roger said:
    It’s almost a Longma. Maybe we need a “longma” species tag?

    Didn't knew about this species, thanks for the discovery ( •͈૦•͈ )
    Ignir would be slightly different tho, he is a dragon/deer hybrid (with no wings)

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #138859
    65 100 3 E
    post #138791
    234 356 8 E
    post #138846
    343 533 3 E

    Blake81

    Member

    As someone who's had the pleasure of touching a llama (well, actually an Alpaca) and that still owns a heavy winter coat made of their wool... man, you have no idea of just how soft they are.

  • |
  • 8
    •
    15 26 1 Q

    Nagiman90

    Member

    She looks like she'd be cozy to snuggle with but probably better to ride too.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #138727
    32 46 1 Q

    Nagiman90

    Member

    Sweet sweet older ladies. This bed is just perfect cause its gonna be holding some shaking later.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #138826
    215 379 1 E

    BrapGod

    Member

    they never said anything about shoving your face in there >:3

  • |
  • 2
    •
    2 6 5 E
    post #138471
    368 637 3 E
    post #138822
    59 101 1 E

    Korb

    Member

    Ah yes, this is actually the size of Nick's cock n' balls, Disney had to do a huge amount of work editing his cock out of every single frame.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #138791
    234 356 8 E

    gtprox

    Member

    redpanda2025 said:
    Urethral groove, external, similar mechanism in some other reptiles like crocodiles, correct?
    GOOD JOB!!

    your version is quite interesting, I didn't even know about the open-topped gutter structure).
    in fact, I really love slits ^///^ and you can imagine that not only the hand was behind the scenes in the slit, but also something else. 👀

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #138833
    175 296 3 E
    57 84 1 Q
    117 180 6 E

    MysticCheetah

    Member

    alaskan_huzky said:
    I'm going to get hated for saying this, but where is the human penis being inserted? Or just hidden under the belly? The angle looks weird.

    Thats because there is no penetration (yet). Shes teasing him as the story and tags suggest. Im surprised that the Picture is hard to read but i will take the critique.
    I see that you enjoy my content so be aware that beeing tempted by eeveelutions will be a reappearing theme.

    Updated

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #138612
    80 91 2 S
    post #138823
    61 75 3 S
    post #132196
    201 262 4 E
    post #104262
    98 155 3 E
    post #138762
    255 494 11 E
    post #138762
    255 494 11 E

    mlem

    Admin

    leveno99 said:
    I don't understand why realistic content is now being penalized; wasn't this the goal of AI art? It really has me very confused.

    Anyone can flag a post, it doesn't automatically mean it's going to be taken down. This one, along with all the other "real-life pornography"-flags that were made within the span of the last few hours, doesn't violate any of the site's guidelines.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #138804
    119 196 3 E
    post #138160
    286 503 3 E
    post #138071
    577 1.1k 13 E

    leveno99

    Member

    I've read the document about these guidelines, and if any moderator hasn't read it, please understand that this doesn't violate any of your design policies. If this was actually caused by someone—I won't say who—or by a moderator—I won't say who either—it's well known that instead of going backwards, which is what we're doing, we should offer some artists the opportunity to show this type of content. This shouldn't be the case. While it's taken from some "real" content, it's just a piece for its development, not its structure as such. In fact, the majority, or 99%, of those who post here do that, so I don't see it as a violation. Correct me if you want, but this isn't real content, just fictional. If we ever find "real furry rabbits," I can redeem myself right now—if there were any.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    2 6 5 E
    post #138791
    234 356 8 E
    post #138777
    121 220 2 E