Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #128993
    321 525 7 E

    Ok I had to come back because I saw this dog for the first time in Walmart the day after I saw this post. I was like "omg there he is! I remember that face!"

  • |
  • 2
  • post #129106
    266 365 12 E

    I remember the old days when the mafia just outfitted people with cement shoes, but this is ridiculous

  • |
  • 13
  • post #129120
    45 65 2 S
    post #129108
    174 303 1 E
    post #129083
    89 195 2 E
    374 591 5 E
    post #128580
    117 130 12 Q
    post #128884
    116 122 7 E
    post #129036
    202 380 2 E
    post #107902
    351 561 3 E
    post #128385
    163 241 4 E
    post #129106
    266 365 12 E
    11 25 1 E
    17 24 2 E
    post #129087
    154 242 7 E

    As for suggestions, could I suggest/request something with Bill? I'm open to anything there, sub or dom, harness or leggings/panties.~

  • |
  • 0
  • post #129087
    154 242 7 E

    Jack? ✅
    Leggings? ✅
    Panties/Thong? ✅
    Hoodie/Sweater? ✅
    Eyeliner? ✅
    Bulge? ✅

    So many things to enjoy about this, can't get enough. <333

  • |
  • 1
  • post #129116
    114 160 5 Q

    hogan said:
    Ok, well .... you're gonna have to extrapolate this one some more!!!!

    Like, how this came to be? Just getting tipsy with the Mrs, we're like sending dumb shit back and forth, she sends the og meme by mistake. And I enlightened by my drunken stupor, was struck by an epiphany.

    Tldr, the genie in the bottle spoke, and I listened

  • |
  • 2
  • post #129037
    15 9 4 S
    post #129116
    114 160 5 Q

    Ok, well .... you're gonna have to extrapolate this one some more!!!!

  • |
  • 2
  • post #129090
    52 86 2 Q
    post #128329
    60 106 2 E

    c32 said:
    That's one fantastic cock <3

    Thanks! I actually hoped to get something closer to an actual croc cock with a humanoid twist, but the model just won't cooperate for 99 gens out of 100.
    At least this exaggerated version of a canine shape still has some of the contrast between shaft and base.

    And hey, it looks good on him I think. Don't know why but knots just work with puffy slits. :3

    It's also pretty fun to imagine it shooting out as stupidly fast as in real life (cause TMI: those things are super weird, like, perma-erect and pretty much squeezed out of hiding in a flash by muscle that's not even directly connected, and retracted just as quickly).

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #129106
    266 365 12 E
    post #129050
    163 248 1 Q
    post #129098
    98 184 4 E
    post #129044
    169 321 1 E
    post #129043
    79 114 1 E
    post #129095
    283 477 3 E
    post #91630
    116 186 3 E
    post #92033
    62 94 1 E
    post #94625
    138 203 2 E
    post #113915
    164 269 3 E
    post #129087
    154 242 7 E
    post #122818
    84 118 3 E
    post #128263
    93 123 1 E
    post #129098
    98 184 4 E
    post #129033
    82 154 2 E
    post #129046
    98 168 1 E
    post #129035
    237 452 1 E
    post #129016
    85 150 2 E
    post #128886
    401 702 3 E
    post #129075
    12 11 1 S
    post #128993
    321 525 7 E
    post #129071
    141 186 1 E
    post #129070
    111 182 1 E
    post #128444
    21 24 1 S

    Not that im an AI fan but this is cool. The art style is like the official posters the ones without lineart visability

  • |
  • 0
  • post #117104
    345 597 5 E
    post #129053
    153 251 3 E
    post #129053
    153 251 3 E
    post #115810
    38 32 4 S

    cockaforce said:
    Image stating something like that like... Well.. 1-2 years ago even.

    With the state of AI music generation, I would have believed it a year or two ago for the audio -- but having her *sing along* to it in the animation? That feels like magic to me. (I know there's video workflows that specialize in that now, so I probably shouldn't be so amazed by it, but I still am!!)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #128030
    112 162 2 Q

    beepbep said:
    She was definitely about to stuff that rodent in her mouth before she noticed us, lol

    She was going to do something with it for sure...

  • |
  • 1
  • post #128183
    31 48 2 Q

    This sounds like the premise of a very interesting story here. Are the partners they with human, or other creatures and what else is going on to warrant to sleep with others?🤔

  • |
  • 0
  • post #128949
    185 318 3 E
    post #128730
    79 109 5 Q
    post #128969
    139 235 2 E
    25 40 1 E
    post #128938
    204 451 9 E
    33 60 1 E
    post #128007
    118 204 1 E
    post #129009
    520 885 5 E
    post #129045
    93 143 1 E
    post #129053
    153 251 3 E
    post #129056
    111 173 1 E
    post #128938
    204 451 9 E

    redpanda said:
    Even if both have 5 toes, it's hard to see any similarity.
    You don't see the problem? A tail that size can't be squeezed that deep. When compressed as flat as here, there isn't even room for the bones of the tail. In the first picture, one could still assume that the leg had disappeared under the tail, or perhaps in the long fur. If you want to maintain this position, you'll have to adjust the man slightly. If he's supposed to sit, no further than where the blue fur begins, and that's already generous. Make it a sitting position, even if you can't see the penetration itself. If you want the penetration to be visible, you can also make it vaginal. The magic word is anatomy. :-)

    Otherwise, the picture looks nice.

    Thank you for your review. I must admit that the tail crushed under the man's weight is overly pronounced. You score a point there.
    It was difficult to correct the generated image, trying to restart the mask generation without affecting the rest too much. Even in Photoshop, I couldn't achieve the desired result.
    Somehow, I managed to achieve this result despite the inconsistency of the anatomy. For me, who is more into qualitative than quantitative, this is a real blow to me. 😅
    I've only been experimenting with scenes with multiple characters for a few days, which is a much more complex challenge than with a single character.
    I'll learn from my generation mistakes, and once again, thank you for pointing out the inconsistencies. 😉

    Sorry if my English is a bit off!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #128884
    116 122 7 E

    ailurus said:
    My MLP:FIM wiki skills aren’t great to be honest 😅

    Nah I think it's way more fun this way.

    I imagine Flash Sentry rushing over to Canterlot Like he was on his second lap being chased by fly pizza. xD

  • |
  • 0
  • post #104403
    129 179 2 E
    post #104403
    129 179 2 E

    From now on there will be no more uploads from me, e6AI blocked me for some reason! It's your own fault e6ai🖕🏻, bye!!!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #128997
    180 285 1 E
    post #59112
    12 19 1 Q

    Nick Wilde and panties go together like peanut butter and jelly. It’s a bit harder imagining him wearing male-gendered underwear as the default (though that can be hot too, ofc.)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #77162
    46 70 1 Q

    I don’t think he is overweight, imo, just slightly above average weight. I guess you could say he is husky, no pun intended.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #80837
    103 153 3 E
    post #117376
    59 104 1 E

    Who knew Tod would make such a good femboi? Definitely need to see some more of him exploring his feminine side!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #128884
    116 122 7 E

    DeNatural

    Former Staff

    artificialbrony said:
    why censor yourself on a porn site? Genuinely curious.

    This is not a porn site! This is a curated gallery for classy people.
    this is representation of how this site would look like in real life:
    post #93645

  • |
  • 3
  • post #128278
    114 139 16 S

    firemetal said:
    What a weird, pretentious, and douchey way to talk. Im with the other guy. The overwhelming irony of saying "bUrN thE pDfS" yet having your particular favorites list, yet somehow pretending youre only talking about "file formats'.

    The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

    Agree to disagree.

  • |
  • -4
  • post #128952
    325 561 3 E
    post #129037
    15 9 4 S