Aight, myself, and I'm sure the rest of the perverts here would like to know HOW you managed to make Kling to a 30 second 'demonstration' of a horse tool so well! :D

I'm wondering if it wasn't a bait and switch -- have something that wouldn't trigger the internals in the general shape in the original image, and then photoshopped the horse later, if that's even a thing that can be done.

goldanthrowolf said:
Aight, myself, and I'm sure the rest of the perverts here would like to know HOW you managed to make Kling to a 30 second 'demonstration' of a horse tool so well! :D

So, Kling (currently) only generates 5 or 10 second clips, and one way to extend an entire scene out is to take the very last frame of a video and put it as the new source image to generate another 5 (or 10) second clip. You'll notice at 5 seconds in, there's a "jump", and her fur color becomes slightly more saturated. That's that start of a new 10 second clip, and you'll notice it at the end of those 10 seconds, the same clip is just played in reverse to occupy 10 more seconds. When that clip reaches the end, a new 5 second clip is generated where she cups the head of the shaft. The director is taking these chunks of clips and editing them together in a clever manner to be a continuous clip.

As far as how the source images got past the NSFW detection, sometimes it's luck, or perhaps a new exploit. Generally, though, Kling is a little more lenient on animal genitalia, and I suspect that's because animal bits are just out all the time in a SFW manner, so it's not often being detected as something naughty.

Funnily enough, even though there's a fully erect horse cock with balls out in the open, if Diane's boobs were exposed, I guarantee Kling would have rejected the image. It's far more honed in on NSFW human anatomy, which is why you'll rarely see boobs out in Kling generated clips... They really don't like jugs.