lythomir directed by redactedpaws
Viewing sample resized to 66% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

Biological Compatibility and Offspring

Female Lythomir, who hold the majority of societal power, have unique reproductive capabilities that allow them to bear offspring with a few other species, including humans. However, these cross-species pairings do not produce hybrids. Instead, any child born from such a union is purely Lythomir, inheriting only minor traits from the non-Lythomir parent, such as variations in fur or eye color. This biological phenomenon is viewed almost as a “genetic blessing” in Lythomir culture, allowing their race to broaden its diversity while maintaining its genetic identity.

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • What's the level of attachment a female can get with a human partner? Do they mate for life and grow emotionally dependant of their mates?
    Edit: Also, what's the level of interest lythomir girls have in humies?

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • singularitylover said:
    What's the level of attachment a female can get with a human partner? Do they mate for life and grow emotionally dependant of their mates?
    Edit: Also, what's the level of interest lythomir girls have in humies?

    Lythomir society is matriarchal in its structure, meaning the girlie's are in charge. They are typically more dominant in the relationship and value strength and resilience in their mates whether it be physically or mentally. This doesn't just apply to humans, but within their own species as well.. Typically, females will stick with one partner so long as said partner adheres to the fact that the woman is the figurehead of the family. They are mostly monogamous, highly valuing loyalty.

    I'll be dumping a metric fuckton of lore snippets here and there. Stay tuned!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • redactedpaws said:
    They are mostly monogamous, highly valuing loyalty.

    That sounds like not really faithful if I'm honest. Like they put more of the weight of being faithful on their mates rather than sharing it in the relationship, in other words, if the previous statement wouldn't lend itself to understanding, that they do not form deep affective bonds with their mates.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0