directed by birdlover
Viewing sample resized to 18% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

Oh, just a fox on a bed. Lol.

Beerwolf was sad that post #58267 did not have any nips. So I experimented a bit. This is the result

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Upscaling this much makes a lot of the detail look a bit odd. Just a suggestion but you should consider trying a smaller resolution.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • jelloponies said:
    Upscaling this much makes a lot of the detail look a bit odd. Just a suggestion but you should consider trying a smaller resolution.

    Hmm, not sure if you refer to artifacts from the Diffusion Process (I upscale from 768x768 --> 1152x1152 with something equivalent to HiResFix), or from the traditional Upscale (I post process using a 4x traditional Upscaler like SRFormer).

    I assume you might refer to the traditional upscale. If so, you're probably right. I only look at those pics in full resolution to check which traditional upscale did the best job and then select it. Otherwise I Just see them in 2k. Guess I should add a Downscaling step before publishing.

    Is that what you had in mind?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • birdlover said:
    Hmm, not sure if you refer to artifacts from the Diffusion Process (I upscale from 768x768 --> 1152x1152 with something equivalent to HiResFix), or from the traditional Upscale (I post process using a 4x traditional Upscaler like SRFormer).

    I assume you might refer to the traditional upscale. If so, you're probably right. I only look at those pics in full resolution to check which traditional upscale did the best job and then select it. Otherwise I Just see them in 2k. Guess I should add a Downscaling step before publishing.

    Is that what you had in mind?

    I just note that if you open the full res image and look at parts like the mouth it just kinda melts together. Feels like it might be better to not upscale it to over 4k pixels in each direction if it ends up ruining the detail.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • jelloponies said:
    I just note that if you open the full res image and look at parts like the mouth it just kinda melts together. Feels like it might be better to not upscale it to over 4k pixels in each direction if it ends up ruining the detail.

    Got it. I'll try to do that. Though, there'll still be quite a few pics that I'll be posting 4k+. I've already post processed around 200 pics that are waiting for an upload. I don't want to re-do those. Hope you don't mind xD

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • foxymutt said:
    Better without nips but still looks good ๐Ÿ‘

    Thanks. Guess I'll keep most of my canines nip free in the future. Will only add them every once in a while, just to shake things up :D

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • birdlover said:
    Thanks. Guess I'll keep most of my canines nip free in the future. Will only add them every once in a while, just to shake things up :D

    I like the nips :(

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3