This is a magnificent piece and very detailed; holy cow. I am impressed; I love it. What AI generator did you use to make this?

Another masterpiece 😻

jin said:
This is a magnificent piece and very detailed; holy cow. I am impressed; I love it. What AI generator did you use to make this?

thanks! i used Indigo Furry Mix Realistic 110, also a few LoRAs and workflow tricks:
https://civitai.com/models/98543/photographic-trend (LoRA) - use at low weight, like 0.25
https://civitai.com/models/13941?modelVersionId=18445 - offset noise

foxymutt said:
Another masterpiece 😻

aww, thanks!

What prompts were used to make this astonishing piece?

jin said:
What prompts were used to make this astonishing piece?

thanks for the kind words. i can show you the prompt but most of my results come from the processes i use (and just tweaking parameters until i get a result i like). i'd say my prompting is generally quite bad so i don't really recommend trying to emulate it.

if you don't use ComfyUI, get rid of the STYLE lines and change [CUT:red fox:red] to just red fox (the cutoff stuff is a way to try to prevent concept bleed, i think there's also a way to do that in A1111). you may also have to use a different syntax for embeddings.

there's some information about the LoRAs and model up above.

POSITIVE

STYLE(A1111,length)
solo focus, female , 
thicc (siberian husky ,:1.05)
(feminine , :0.9)
(looking back at viewer , spread legs, kneeling , :0.8)
(presenting hindquarters ,)
(big butt ,  perineum , :1.0)
((puckered pink :0.8) anus , :0.98)
(medium breasts , pink nipples , :0.9)
(anatomically correct, [CUT:plump labia,:plump] canine pussy , :1.05)
(raised tail , tail aside ,:0.975)
(werecanine , :0.9) 
(wide hips ,  :0.8)
[CUT:muscular thighs,muscular butt,:muscular:0.95]
(realistic, realistic fur, detailed, masterwork, absurd res, detailed background, amazing background,  :0.7)
(rim lighting, chest tuft, full-length portrait , :0.7)
(pink nose,  head tilt , :0.98)
(glistening genitalia ,  :0.6)
(big paws, shy smile ,   :0.5)
[CUT:black sclera ,:black:1.1]
(bokeh, analog photo, subsurface scattering , :0.7)
(big eyes, glowing [CUT:amber eyes,:amber] :0.9)
[CUT:glowing eyes,:glowing:1.05]
(handpaws , :0.9)
[CUT:4 toes ,:4:1.0]
(sunbeam , :0.5)

NEGATIVE

STYLE(A1111)
text, watermark, multi (genitalia , :0.5) multi (balls , :0.5) unusual anatomy , (clitoris , :0.85) multi anus
, humanoid genitalia , (cum in anus , :0.5) train, multi limb, front view, multi ear ,
(chubby, overweight, plump, gaping anus , :0.75)
colored sclera,
muscular , big breasts
, navel, wide eyes, small eyes, small iris, blue eyes
, (high contrast, overexposed, sepia, brown, monochrome, long neck , multi tail , hands , fingers , 5 fingers , beard, facial hair , :0.7)
(embedding:boring_e621_v4  , :0.4)

again, i don't recommend prompting like this. sometimes i just put weird stuff in to see what happens, sometimes it can produce good results but it's probably worse on average to do it that way.

looks like i actually did a two step highres fix type workflow this once, the initial generation was 896x1024. weird sampling settings so that information won't help you much.