Topic: [APPROVED] [BUR] Friend, widow and other relationship tags

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #642 is active.

create alias friend (0) -> invalid_tag (1)
create alias widow (0) -> invalid_tag (1)
create alias lover (0) -> invalid_tag (1)
remove alias lovers (0) -> couple_(disambiguation) (0)
remove alias couple (0) -> couple_(disambiguation) (0)
remove alias couples (0) -> couple_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias partner (0) -> invalid_tag (1)
create alias partners (0) -> invalid_tag (1)
create alias boss (8) -> invalid_tag (1)
create alias bosses (0) -> invalid_tag (1)

Reason: Uniformization of relationship tags.

see topic #768

Follow up of changes related to friends

Follow Up
alias lovers -> invalid_tag
alias couple -> invalid_tag
alias couples -> invalid_tag

EDIT: The bulk update request #642 (forum #4630) has been approved by @Jelloponies.

Updated by auto moderator

dfY6C

Privileged

I think ceti may have made a mistake in the original request with friends at topic #768 because it's set to implicate invalid_tag rather than aliasing to it. If you're willing, we may have to edit this BUR to account for this. I'm thinking of this:

unimply friends -> invalid_tag
alias friends -> invalid_tag

Idk if both can be done in one BUR without an error, you can try adding it and see if it says something about that. If it does throw up an error, then the unimplication probably has to be done first and then the follow-up could have the alias.

Updated

dfy6c said:
I think ceti may have made a mistake in the original request with friends at topic #768 because it's set to implicate invalid_tag rather than aliasing to it. If you're willing, we may have to edit this BUR to account for this. I'm thinking of this:

unimply friends -> invalid_tag
alias friends -> invalid_tag

Idk if both can be done in one BUR without an error, you can try adding it and see if it says something about that. If it does throw up an error, then the unimplication probably has to be done first and then the follow-up could have the alias.

Good catch! I've corrected it, thank you