Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: canine_sheath -> animal_genitalia

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

dfY6C

Privileged

This should most likely be changed to go from canine_sheath -> sheath instead. Then it would follow other similar tagging conventions that go from subcategory -> main category. For example, a currently active implication chain on e6ai is:

canine_penis -> animal_penis -> animal_genitalia -> genitals

Sheath itself has a pre-existing implication chain that goes from sheath -> animal_genitalia -> genitals so if you change your implication to the way I suggested, you would have:

canine_sheath -> sheath -> *animal_genitalia* -> genitals

Makes sense, right?

Updated

dfy6c said:
This should most likely be changed to go from canine_sheath -> sheath instead. Then it would follow other similar tagging conventions that go from subcategory -> main category.

This is correct.

dfY6C

Privileged

The bulk update request #653 is active.

create implication canine_sheath (16) -> sheath (4906)
create implication canine_sheath (16) -> canine_genitalia (15703)

Reason: MagicRaven probably didn't see our responses here, so I'm going ahead and posting the corrected version here, at least the first line. I added canine_sheath -> canine_genitalia after thinking about it, as specifying canine_sheath is similar to canine_penis and canine_pussy implying a specific type of canine_genitalia.

EDIT: The bulk update request #653 (forum #4702) has been approved by @Jelloponies.

Updated by auto moderator