Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: feline_pussy/feline_penis -> feline_genitalia

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The tag implication #51321 feline_pussy/feline_penis -> feline_genitalia has been rejected.

Reason: I think the reason for this implication is pretty self-explanatory, I would expect to see both feline_penis and feline_pussy if I searched for feline_genitalia. But it also makes me wonder what other Families of animals and their genitals could use this treatment too.

EDIT: The tag implication feline_pussy/feline_penis -> feline_genitalia (forum #4350) has been rejected by @Pyrodelic.

Updated by auto moderator

dfY6C

Privileged

FYI, the slash doesn't separate those tags for the implication system like you're probably thinking. The way you have it set up actually makes feline_pussy/feline_penis one entire tag including the slash, which isn't really a valid tag obviously. You would have to do feline_pussy and feline_penis as separate ones.

Since these would be two change requests, this is where BURs (Bulk Update Requests) would come in. It lets you do multiple change requests in one post instead of having to make separate requests for both feline_pussy and feline_penis individually. You can press request BUR on the top and put these in the script field:

imply feline_pussy -> feline_genitalia
imply feline_penis -> feline_genitalia

Each line in a BUR is counted as a tag request, up to 25 lines in one BUR which obviously is more than enough to fit what you want. It's important to have both of those as separate lines, as that is how the BUR system works (you'll get an error if you don't do it right anyway). I'll let you try it out to see how it works. Don't forget to go into this implication that you posted here and reject it (you can do that by pressing the implication #51321 link).

dfy6c said:
FYI, the slash doesn't separate those tags for the implication system like you're probably thinking. The way you have it set up actually makes feline_pussy/feline_penis one entire tag including the slash, which isn't really a valid tag obviously. You would have to do feline_pussy and feline_penis as separate ones.

Since these would be two change requests, this is where BURs (Bulk Update Requests) would come in. It lets you do multiple change requests in one post instead of having to make separate requests for both feline_pussy and feline_penis individually. You can press request BUR on the top and put these in the script field:

Each line in a BUR is counted as a tag request, up to 25 lines in one BUR which obviously is more than enough to fit what you want. It's important to have both of those as separate lines, as that is how the BUR system works (you'll get an error if you don't do it right anyway). I'll let you try it out to see how it works. Don't forget to go into this implication that you posted here and reject it (you can do that by pressing the implication #51321 link).

dfy6c said:
FYI, the slash doesn't separate those tags for the implication system like you're probably thinking. The way you have it set up actually makes feline_pussy/feline_penis one entire tag including the slash, which isn't really a valid tag obviously. You would have to do feline_pussy and feline_penis as separate ones.

Since these would be two change requests, this is where BURs (Bulk Update Requests) would come in. It lets you do multiple change requests in one post instead of having to make separate requests for both feline_pussy and feline_penis individually. You can press request BUR on the top and put these in the script field:

Each line in a BUR is counted as a tag request, up to 25 lines in one BUR which obviously is more than enough to fit what you want. It's important to have both of those as separate lines, as that is how the BUR system works (you'll get an error if you don't do it right anyway). I'll let you try it out to see how it works. Don't forget to go into this implication that you posted here and reject it (you can do that by pressing the implication #51321 link).

dfy6c said:
FYI, the slash doesn't separate those tags for the implication system like you're probably thinking. The way you have it set up actually makes feline_pussy/feline_penis one entire tag including the slash, which isn't really a valid tag obviously. You would have to do feline_pussy and feline_penis as separate ones.

Since these would be two change requests, this is where BURs (Bulk Update Requests) would come in. It lets you do multiple change requests in one post instead of having to make separate requests for both feline_pussy and feline_penis individually. You can press request BUR on the top and put these in the script field:

Each line in a BUR is counted as a tag request, up to 25 lines in one BUR which obviously is more than enough to fit what you want. It's important to have both of those as separate lines, as that is how the BUR system works (you'll get an error if you don't do it right anyway). I'll let you try it out to see how it works. Don't forget to go into this implication that you posted here and reject it (you can do that by pressing the implication #51321 link).

OH! Sorry about that. I think I get it now.

Thank you for being so nice and helpful to me!

dfY6C

Privileged

No problem! Also, you don't need to worry about the optional forum topic field in the request BUR page, that's just for posting a BUR in an existing thread.