The tag implication #47263 pokemon_(species) -> nintendo has been rejected.

Reason: all pokemon are from nintendo

EDIT: The tag implication pokemon_(species) -> nintendo (forum #60) has been rejected by @Jelloponies.

What of fakemon? The species owner may consider them a Pokemon, but that does not make them property of Nintendo.

tavisnight said:
What of fakemon? The species owner may consider them a Pokemon, but that does not make them property of Nintendo.

The e621 description clears it up: https://e621.net/wiki_pages/6579

Fakemon can be related to pokemon which is owned by Nintendo, so fakemon pokemon fall under Nintendo by proxy. Besides, if it’s a fakemon then it has to imitate the existing pokemon franchise to some extent so that adds more connections to Nintendo.

pokemon (species) implicates Franchise: pokemon which in turn implicates Franchise: nintendo.
Therefore this implication isn't necessary

The tag implication pokemon_(species) -> nintendo (forum #60) has been rejected by @Jelloponies.