Topic: Lackadaisy Characters implying Series Tag

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #731 is pending approval.

create implication ivy_pepper (25) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication rocky_rickaby (16) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication calvin_mcmurray (1) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication viktor_vasko (1) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication mordecai_heller (2) -> lackadaisy (44)

Reason: These are all characters from the webcomic Lackadaisy and therefore should imply the series tag.

Some of these characters already have the series tag as part of the character tag. The names are distinct enough that there probably won't be any conflicts, but should all the names follow that pattern?

Updated

dfY6C

Privileged

I see on e621 that both ivy_pepper and mordecai_heller don't have the _(lackadaisy) in their tags so I think it's safe to say we can change those to exclude the series names here, especially since like you said those character names are currently distinct and don't have any competition yet. If you want to edit the BUR to remove the series name in their tags, I'll switch the existing posts here on e6ai to remove those as well.

Updated

dfY6C

Privileged

The bulk update request #732 is pending approval.

create implication abelard_arbogast (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication asa_sweet (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication atlas_may (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication avery_(lackadaisy) (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication avril_(lackadaisy) (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication ben_(lackadaisy) (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication bobby_bastion (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication dominic_drago (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication dorian_zibowski (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication elsa_bastion (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication emery_(lackadaisy) (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication esther_heller (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication horatio_bruno (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication lacy_hardt (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication mitzi_may (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication mozzie_(lackadaisy) (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication mrs._bapka (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication nicodeme_savoy (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication nina_mcmurray (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication rose_heller (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication ruby_pepper (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication sedgewick_sable (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication serafine_savoy (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication sy_(lackadaisy) (0) -> lackadaisy (44)
create implication virgil_(lackadaisy) (0) -> lackadaisy (44)

Reason: Also, here are the rest of the lackadaisy implications that e621 has. Part 1