Topic: [APPROVED] Nintendo Implication BUR

The bulk update request #79 has been rejected.

remove implication animal_crossing (972) -> nintendo (21608)
remove implication donkey_kong_(series) (43) -> nintendo (21608)
remove implication dragalia_lost (6) -> nintendo (21608)
remove implication mario_bros (585) -> nintendo (21608)
remove implication metroid (92) -> nintendo (21608)
remove implication the_legend_of_zelda (568) -> nintendo (21608)
remove implication pokemon (17575) -> nintendo (21608)
remove implication star_fox (1785) -> nintendo (21608)

Reason: Nintendo is fundamentally a company (a copyright), and not a franchise.

Copyrights, company names, which character is owned by who, doesn't have its place on e6ai. The copyright category first got removed for a reason when e6ai was created, and it was to wipe clean all implication to any copyright tags which would imply that AI art was subject to the same copyright laws as non-generative art, which it isn't.

AI art in most countries is not protected by ownership claims not is it recognized of intellectual property values, so putting copyright tags on generative media is both silly and has potential legal issues for the directors that uploads content here.

Furthermore, tagging copyrights and company names has no meaningful value here, nor is it useful for AI training datasets, and it's certainly not useful for narrowing down content that we're searching for.

If users want to tag tags such as "nintendo" on their own posts manually, they are free to do so. But forcing directors that upload content here to have copyright tags on their AI-generated art is not okay. Nintendo does not have any kind of claim on any of the characters posted here, simply because AI art doesn't retain any proprietary values.

EDIT: The bulk update request #79 (forum #1604) has been rejected by @Jelloponies.

Updated by auto moderator