Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #106249
    90 141 5 E

    Beerwolf

    Privileged

    gammavali said:
    I don't know who you are, anonymous director. But I beg you to create more feral birds, this is wonderful~

    You can see who uploaded it though via tag history.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #106358
    145 210 3 E
    86 146 4 E
    post #106003
    323 562 2 E
    post #105182
    199 296 6 Q
    post #106403
    39 29 3 S

    Beerwolf

    Privileged

    How I experience after eating something with habanero and ghost pepper hot sauce.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #106412
    258 453 2 E
    post #105498
    273 423 5 E

    blp

    Member

    jakal179 said:
    Always enjoy seeing your generations here, and see you posting less and less. Sad to see you go but I can find you on deviant art I believe?

    appreciate that! i was hesitant to even mention the DA username at this point since i don't want to do anything that could be considered deliberately flouting the rules. thanks to lurkingfox it should be relatively easy to find if you're actually looking for it now.

    lurkingfox said:
    The DA main user page might be problematic only because it doesn't show much except the paywall, at least without logging in. You can still link on your own profile on your user page (Settings > "About Me" and "Commission Info") and your director tag wiki page. (I expect them to eventually adapt the e621 "artists" page too.)

    thanks for doing that! just way to say what you saw on the DA main user page is absolutely not paywalled content. DA just doesn't show you mature stuff if you're not logged in, which isn't something i can control. all the stuff you see in the featured, anthro and feral galleries there is full quality, unwatermarked, uncensored and allows download of the full quality version. a lot of stuff there is marked as adoptables but since i'm already posting the full quality version without any watermarks or censoring it's really just for people who enjoy collecting things and having their name associated with the image, people that didn't adopt something still get to see/download the image without restrictions.

    there is some exclusive content but i have it in one specific gallery that i don't promote to the featured or normal category pages so people don't have to wade through a bunch of stuff they're not allowed to see. some people will disagree with any type of monetization of AI stuff so those people probably won't be happy whatever i do but i actually do try quite hard to make it as unobtrusive as possible.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #106385
    144 215 6 E
    post #106389
    45 67 1 E
    23 31 1 E

    IAracageI

    Privileged

    The situation with the passive's left foot is somewhat confusing...When comparing it with the right one, it is not clear where this length goes. In a good way, they should be in the same position.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #93005
    246 406 4 E

    Norlus

    Member

    corsetlover69 said:
    100% agree with this!

    (Also totally unrelated but seeing someone use my gens as a pfp made my day :) )

    You are welcome. Zebras are also an underrated species, and it is rare to find "good" pictures. Zebra mare are my spirit animal. And your works are always a banger, so i found my pnp :D.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #106447
    450 786 3 E

    Norlus

    Member

    My god...how i love this. More power to interspecies riding positions. :D

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #106401
    594 1.0k 19 E

    VlrgRomNS

    Member

    assquatch said:
    Their double standards do not end on quality control either, they're extremely inconsistent in their calls. It's obvious that they can't separate their personal preferences from guidelines at all.

    As I am still convinced that in this and in other posts, people who watch it don't give a shit about any flaws/glitch in the video, as well as moderators as I see. But no, it's still such a hyper attitude towards video quality, like I'm being paid for video quality or making money off of it. Speaking of quality, https://e6ai.net/posts/105013 earlier such a video would have been deleted without question, but no, not only does it look like they wiped their ass, but also with multiple glitches, accepted by the way Сeti

  • |
  • 6
    •
    post #105931
    243 367 5 Q
    post #105833
    86 161 1 E
    post #106464
    209 359 1 E
    post #106390
    36 43 5 S
    post #79293
    134 237 2 E
    post #106004
    480 838 2 E
    post #106385
    144 215 6 E
    post #106384
    257 444 1 E
    post #106461
    113 153 1 Q
    post #102788
    378 727 6 E

    sealofharps

    Member

    zaxxxer said:
    As rb2303 said under one of another post:

    Many thanks

    I have been enjoying these builds by otter very much over time

    Saw yours recently too !

    Awesome work to both of you!!!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #106332
    155 337 3 E
    post #106290
    141 203 4 E
    post #106396
    270 493 6 E
    post #106300
    16 16 17 S

    user 23385

    Member

    assquatch said:
    *voice and reason*

    Thank you Mr. Ass for the intelligence, reading the whole jargon from others on my posts is very amusing

    :D

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #105946
    220 462 1 E

    WannaKnot

    Member

    Gosh this just tickles me so much, the blush, the eye contact, the cum, so delicious together~

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #106332
    155 337 3 E
    post #105875
    75 129 2 Q
    14 17 1 E
    post #105498
    273 423 5 E

    lurkingfox

    Member

    I think there are reserved places for you to link to those things (though the info is pretty scattered...). But looking at e621:rules#advertising and uploading guidelines#ads: Since this image is not paywalled, I'm pretty sure you use your DA post directly as the source (which I added already). The DA main user page might be problematic only because it doesn't show much except the paywall, at least without logging in. You can still link on your own profile on your user page (Settings > "About Me" and "Commission Info") and your director tag wiki page. (I expect them to eventually adapt the e621 "artists" page too.)

    I suspect the main issue is that additional links elsewhere starts to look spammy, and maybe also link farming or SEO.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #106348
    41 47 2 S
    post #106347
    239 455 3 E
    post #106403
    39 29 3 S
    post #106338
    179 332 3 E
    post #106385
    144 215 6 E
    post #106372
    116 169 1 S
    post #106239
    36 27 5 S
    post #99677
    79 127 1 E
    post #106290
    141 203 4 E
    post #106416
    129 250 1 E
    155 255 3 E
    post #106412
    258 453 2 E
    post #106401
    594 1.0k 19 E
    post #106401
    594 1.0k 19 E

    Assquatch

    Blocked

    vlrgromns said:
    I love moderators for double standards, sometimes fuck for wrong moving pixel, which only under a magnifying glass will notice, but some extra limb as at 0:20, we accept, do not care. The work is good, by the way. If you play the role of moderator even more, you can still get to the teeth of the dog, would write like this ”Does not meet minimum quality standards (Artistic - the dog's teeth look like needles)"

    Their double standards do not end on quality control either, they're extremely inconsistent in their calls. It's obvious that they can't separate their personal preferences from guidelines at all.

  • |
  • 26
    •
    post #105655
    358 584 3 E

    NotThatClassic

    Member

    how did I miss this??? Sooo dang good, presentation and everything! Your romantic stuff hits home for me as well!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #106403
    39 29 3 S
    post #106401
    594 1.0k 19 E
    post #106275
    79 181 3 E
    post #106401
    594 1.0k 19 E

    VlrgRomNS

    Member

    I love moderators for double standards, sometimes fuck for wrong moving pixel, which only under a magnifying glass will notice, but some extra limb as at 0:20, we accept, do not care. The work is good, by the way. If you play the role of moderator even more, you can still get to the teeth of the dog, would write like this ”Does not meet minimum quality standards (Artistic - the dog's teeth look like needles)"

  • |
  • 21
    •
    post #106402
    159 272 3 E
    post #106399
    300 577 2 E
    post #106401
    594 1.0k 19 E
    post #106401
    594 1.0k 19 E

    Bor

    Member

    This is amazing. Please do some other famous animated dog. Nana would be the best!

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #52299
    88 146 1 E
    post #106399
    300 577 2 E
    post #106332
    155 337 3 E
    post #106401
    594 1.0k 19 E
    post #104991
    58 90 6 S
    post #106401
    594 1.0k 19 E
    post #106052
    190 287 9 Q
    post #106390
    36 43 5 S
    post #106065
    105 182 4 E

    loliconcon

    Member

    pawprintz15 said:
    It's the lack of shadows on the ground under their feet. They're supposed to be cast on the ground by their bodies' silhouettes.

    That's what creates the floating, or having been pasted in, illusion. It happens in game design with character models not casting a shadow.

    Appreciate the advice. I'll keep that in mind for the future.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #106390
    36 43 5 S
    post #106363
    57 90 2 E
    post #106394
    70 84 1 S
    post #106383
    170 228 1 Q
    post #106289
    152 256 2 Q
    post #106393
    144 203 2 E
    post #106374
    129 182 6 E
    post #106390
    36 43 5 S
    post #106385
    144 215 6 E
    post #105296
    119 231 1 E