Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #100602
    103 172 1 E
    post #88366
    274 474 4 E
    post #100184
    384 665 20 E

    dts said:
    I'd LOVE to see that nightmare fuel!

    Didn't want to post that here, but I have a compilation of that and other scrapped clips on my Telegram channel (in the source link).

  • |
  • 1
  • post #100475
    183 315 2 E
    post #100632
    193 355 5 E
    post #100587
    96 171 1 E
    153 283 2 E
    post #99421
    335 627 10 E

    in a few years we'll look back at this and say, "ai really sucked back then" but on this site, you'll be remembered as a pioneer of ai furry porn anims. not sure that's something to be proud of (definitely not something you want to put on your resume) but know that at least some people here appreciate the work you've done.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #94633
    70 90 1 Q
    post #100611
    103 130 3 S

    Super Cool ! ... and a little weird.

    Can we have luna wearing shadow ?

  • |
  • 4
  • post #100611
    103 130 3 S
    73 142 1 E
    post #100598
    231 348 1 E
    post #100585
    130 234 5 E

    Looks good! Sadly prob get removed because of the signature attempt though

  • |
  • 2
  • post #100482
    143 218 3 E
    post #98512
    262 459 5 E

    One of these days, male creators will learn you can't pierce the cervix with a dick, and if you did, you would cause permanent damage to the woman.

    And yet we can't stop seeing furry art with the woman in rapture with an internal to show her cervix being punctured.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #100533
    88 156 1 E
    post #100585
    130 234 5 E
    post #75257
    83 147 1 E
    post #100341
    81 105 3 E

    furryranch said:
    Neve said it was to scale if you choose to ignore camera perspective.

    If it was to scale, we would be seeing the bottom of the cars profile, essentially looking under the car. but we can see the full car, meaning she is much bigger than the car

    Scientifically, this make the image 1000% hotter

  • |
  • -2
  • post #100425
    191 308 2 Q
    post #100521
    113 215 1 E
    post #100551
    71 89 2 S
    post #100553
    165 268 1 E
    post #100557
    175 300 1 E
    post #100449
    163 297 1 Q
    post #100479
    218 379 1 E
    post #100551
    71 89 2 S
    post #100513
    209 325 3 E
    post #100448
    301 595 5 E

    Shorten the guys dick up a bit and add a fourth, someone doing the dog's ass.
    Possibly another dog?? dunno what might be easier.
    I really have no clue how complicated prompts are.
    Just a suggestion.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #100552
    132 222 1 E
    post #100343
    351 565 3 E
    15 13 6 E

    And all quiet suddenly that I called out the obvious double standard of low integrity moderators, posting obviously digitally drawn, not AI-generated art. I will see myself out of this bullshit website.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #97109
    80 103 1 Q
    post #100510
    179 332 4 E
    post #100431
    149 226 3 E

    For real though, why won't her friends let human lass have some dick?

  • |
  • 2
  • 15 13 6 E

    So... I'm a little confused. Is this, or is this not a site for posting AI generated art? Because, while I can certainly appreciate that minor imperfections are distracting, all of those quality standards are specifically targeted at the commonplace hallmarks of AI art generators in general. Sure, I can crop the picture to remove a faux-signature that I didn't realize was generated, but certain flaws are normally to be expected of AI art generation, especially when highly detailed prompts push the generator to produce unconventional anatomies. By all means though, if there's a free-use generator that can do a better job I'd love to be informed of it.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #100510
    179 332 4 E

    Love this guy's work!!! It's beyond comparison to all other AI animations! Full stop!

  • |
  • 5
  • post #100475
    183 315 2 E
    post #100487
    118 199 3 E
    15 13 6 E

    vae_super_stultum said:
    Someone mind telling me exactly which posting guideline this supposedly doesn't follow? Because I've checked, and rechecked them over, and over, and OVER, and as far as I can see, I've met the criteria of ALL posting guidelines to the letter, as they are written.

    Have you also checked our quality guidelines visual references? https://e6ai.net/wiki_pages/753

  • |
  • 0
  • 15 13 6 E

    vae_super_stultum said:
    Someone mind telling me exactly which posting guideline this supposedly doesn't follow? Because I've checked, and rechecked them over, and over, and OVER, and as far as I can see, I've met the criteria of ALL posting guidelines to the letter, as they are written.

    Tail mishap and the tiny text on the bottom right corner, probably. Either way, you would have a reason granted if it's removed later. Nice OC.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #80546
    64 91 2 Q
    post #100519
    71 111 1 E
    post #100513
    209 325 3 E
    15 13 6 E

    Someone mind telling me exactly which posting guideline this supposedly doesn't follow? Because I've checked, and rechecked them over, and over, and OVER, and as far as I can see, I've met the criteria of ALL posting guidelines to the letter, as they are written.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #100463
    119 168 3 E
    post #100428
    76 137 1 E
    post #100510
    179 332 4 E
    post #100499
    72 126 2 Q
    post #100514
    148 239 3 E
    post #100514
    148 239 3 E
    post #99956
    167 302 2 E

    Not sure how I missed this, but I love it. Very sexy, and as always it's great to see your lovely otter girls!

  • |
  • 3
  • 120 215 1 E
    post #100497
    18 45 2 E
    post #100328
    185 312 3 E
    post #100493
    175 322 1 E

    You still post the hottest otterbabes. What a stunning gal she is, and so, so sexy, too! Not to mention cheeky, showing off in public like that, but that just makes it all the more fun! Wish I had a girl like her!

  • |
  • 5
  • post #100477
    142 209 2 Q
    post #100494
    57 92 2 E
    post #100477
    142 209 2 Q
    post #100464
    92 134 1 S

    Did you lose a contact lens, Mila? I'm sure you'll have plenty of volunteers to help search between you and the TV.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #100482
    143 218 3 E

    Oooh, I already love this one.

    So dynamic! Such a nice pose.

    And a tinsy-winsy bit of lewd :p

  • |
  • 4
  • post #100348
    158 269 2 E

    zheneric said:
    An awesome stretch and spread there. How deep can she go~?

    Yeah, I rarely do this kind of image. It was more of an accident. But I guess it was a happy accident xD

    zheneric said:
    Also, is this a new alt account for you?

    Yep, I decided to post slightly more risky material that deviates from my normal style under the insane-birdlover director name. Some people might not like it, so I give them an easy way to blacklist this stuff via the alternate director tag.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #89937
    271 490 1 E
    post #96083
    137 250 1 E
    post #97546
    360 602 6 E
    post #92876
    76 73 6 S

    degenstoic said:
    As someone who has done a bit of inpainting, I'm going to guess:
    SD generated it with the paw overlapping the stones like that, and the genner decided to have fun with it, and added the smoke and burn mark.
    A giveaway, that I haven't figured out how to avoid, is brushstroke resolution. The grainyness elsewhere, mimicking the effect of bristles on canvas, changes in density when inpainting at a higher resolution.

    Spot on! I was going to shift the whole campfire from under her paw but got the idea for toasted beans, less work and a fun detail!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #100463
    119 168 3 E
    post #100413
    372 621 3 E
    post #100352
    95 143 2 E
    post #100458
    127 183 2 S
    post #100346
    22 29 1 E
    post #100351
    141 237 3 E
    post #100352
    95 143 2 E
    82 117 1 E