The bulk update request #83 has been rejected.

mass update lifts_her_tail -> lifts-her-tail
mass update lusty_argonian_maid -> the_lusty_argonian_maid
create implication lifts-her-tail (33) -> the_lusty_argonian_maid (32)

Reason: As with most Tamrielic Argonian names, hers is written with a hyphen.

Lifts-Her-Tail

Certainly not, kind sir! I am here but to clean your chambers.

Crantius Colto

Is that all you have come here for, little one? My chambers?

Lifts-Her-Tail

I have no idea what it is you imply, master. I am but a poor Argonian maid.

EDIT: The bulk update request #83 (forum #1712) has been rejected by @Jelloponies.

Its better to make an alias than a mass update

The bulk update request #84 is active.

create alias lifts_her_tail (3) -> lifts-her-tail (33)
create implication lifts-her-tail (33) -> the_lusty_argonian_maid (32)
create alias lusty_argonian_maid (9) -> the_lusty_argonian_maid (32)
create implication the_lusty_argonian_maid (32) -> the_elder_scrolls (575)

Reason: Counter proposal and aliasing to the actual name of the novel which includes "The"

EDIT: The bulk update request #84 (forum #1714) has been approved by @Jelloponies.

I'm confused as to why a character tag has to imply another character tag, for a single character in a solo pic... You end up with 2 character "names" for a single character present with that implication.

If it's the actual name of the novel and not a character, then yes add the "the" and convert tag type as franchise.

The bulk update request #84 (forum #1714) has been approved by @Jelloponies.

The bulk update request #83 (forum #1712) has been rejected by @Jelloponies.

https://elderscrolls.fandom.com/wiki/Lifts-Her-Tail
says
"Lifts-Her-Tail is a character from the book The Lusty Argonian Maid, A Song and its sequels".

That Elder Scrolls wiki doesn't seem to have any wiki page for any of the sequels (if they exist) ... so changing the_lusty_argonian_maid into a copyright franchise tag seems reasonable.

edit: changed the_lusty_argonian_maid into a franchise tag.

edit: found another Elder Scrolls wiki and
if https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:The_Lusty_Argonian_Maid
is correct the "sequels" mentioned above are probably "Act VII, Scene II" which is an additional part of "The Lusty Argonian Maid" that was added in Skyrim)

listerthesquirrel said:
https://elderscrolls.fandom.com/wiki/Lifts-Her-Tail
says
"Lifts-Her-Tail is a character from the book The Lusty Argonian Maid, A Song and its sequels".

That Elder Scrolls wiki doesn't seem to have any wiki page for any of the sequels (if they exist) ... so changing the_lusty_argonian_maid into a copyright franchise tag seems reasonable.

edit: changed the_lusty_argonian_maid into a franchise tag.

edit: found another Elder Scrolls wiki and
if https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:The_Lusty_Argonian_Maid
is correct the "sequels" mentioned above are probably "Act VII, Scene II" which is an additional part of "The Lusty Argonian Maid" that was added in Skyrim)

Franchise's section are for real world franchises. The Lusty Argonian Maid is just roleplay content that lives within the the_elder_scrolls series.

(Thanks regarding franchise category)

Related:
Wondering about argonian posts. Argonian implies ONLY to scalie, but some posts are getting tagged with other species tags.

Example: argonian solo spectags:>=3

I assume what is happeneing is that some taggers are looking at (for example) the top image of
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Argonian
they see that wiki image doesn't have horns, and are adding dragon tag because e6ai upload has horns.

BUT most of the argonian heads at https://en.uesp.net/wiki/File:SR-race-Argonian.jpg
("A montage of Argonian faces from Skyrim")
have horns.

For solo images such as
post #98172
is it reasonable to reduce the species tags to just argonian and scalie???

***

Also: sub-set involves posts tagged with both anthro and humanoid : argonian humanoid anthro solo.

Checked all the argonian solo humanoid posts,
and all the argonians look anthro to me
(and the humanoid wiki says "for tagging purposes, a character CANNOT be BOTH anthro and humanoid.")

***

EDIT: most argonian uploads don't have a description (descriptions that could be used verify species etc):

• (72 with description : argonian hasdescription:true (and some of them not useful regarding species)
• (158 withOUT description {(28×2)+(15×4)+2} : argonian hasdescription:false

Slightly more than half don't have a Source (that could also be used to check species):

• 107 with Source {48+(14×4)+3}: argonian hassource:true , but some Sources NOT useful (example: source of post #98966 is "e6ai.nett", which seems like a typo of e6ai URL)

• 122 withOUT Source {(48×2)+(6×4)+2} : argonian hassource:false