The tag implication #47295 lipsticking -> sheath has been approved.

Reason: It's impossible to tag lipsticking without sheath being present.

EDIT: The tag implication lipsticking -> sheath (forum #480) has been approved by @Jelloponies.

bump. Why has this not been merged yet?

but if you merge them, won't that just make it harder for people to find sheathed penis tip specific images?

kapoki said:
but if you merge them, won't that just make it harder for people to find sheathed penis tip specific images?

how would it be harder? the implication just means tagging something with lipsticking will automatically add sheath to the tags, it's not removing lipsticking or merging it into sheath.

blp said:
how would it be harder? the implication just means tagging something with lipsticking will automatically add sheath to the tags, it's not removing lipsticking or merging it into sheath.

oh. i dont know how tagging works. im new. im used to e621 tagging where if you type like.. "male_genitalia" it just turns into "genitalia" and still shows female genitalia. (also my dumbass accidentally hit report instead of reply and i didnt pay attention before sending this the first time)

no implication/aliases on e621 since its a somewhat "niche" tag as it's kind the same as half-erect but exclusively for canine_penis on sheaths
https://e621.net/wiki_pages/54891

just wanted to include myself in the convo

The tag implication lipsticking -> sheath (forum #480) has been approved by @Jelloponies.