Topic: [BUR] Multiple missing implications of some new tags

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Oarebt

Member

The bulk update request #618 is pending approval.

create implication vedal_(neuroverse) (1) -> neuroverse (1)
create implication neuro_(neuroverse) (1) -> neuroverse (1)
create implication evil_(neuroverse) (1) -> neuroverse (1)
create implication black_cardigan (1) -> cardigan (1)
create implication yellow_cardigan (1) -> cardigan (1)
create implication heart_hair_accessory (0) -> hair_accessory (1474)
create implication skull_hair_accessory (0) -> hair_accessory (1474)
create alias heart_hair_ornament (1) -> heart_hair_accessory (0)
create alias skull_hair_ornament (1) -> skull_hair_accessory (0)

Reason: Just adding the implications for some new tags

dfY6C

Privileged

You accidentally posted this one twice. You might want to reject the other one. Also, I already have band-aid_on_knee covered at topic #851 so you can edit it out of this.

Oarebt

Member

dfy6c said:
You accidentally posted this one twice. You might want to reject the other one. Also, I already have band-aid_on_knee covered at topic #851 so you can edit it out of this.

You are right, it somehow got duplicated.
I probably pressed the submit button twice and it sent the request twice.

Rejected the BUR #619 request.
And removed band-aid_on_knee since you covered it (and is also more accurate)

Hey, sorry to bother, I took a look at these tags again and I realized something that I think probably warrants another edit to the BUR. I just noticed that there is a currently active alias for hair_ornament -> hair_accessory on e6ai, so I was thinking for the heart and skull hair ornaments maybe those 2 lines should be replaced with:

alias heart_hair_ornament -> heart_hair_accessory
alias skull_hair_ornament -> skull_hair_accessory
imply heart_hair_accessory -> hair_accessory
imply skull_hair_accessory -> hair_accessory

This would have it match the general hair_accessory tag having the same ornament alias for consistency and would consolidate those tags before they start getting accidentally split up between _accessory and _ornament.