Topic: No 3D BUR (Important)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

FlowerSylveon

Privileged

The bulk update request #471 is pending approval.

change category 3d_animation (0) -> invalid
change category 3d_(artwork) (288) -> invalid

Reason: for something to be 3D there should be in fact 3D
I have searched for posts and posts and other sources but for e6ai content from directors, there are no 3D gens, only gens with the goal to achieve the "same feel" as 3d but it's still all 2D as it stands for now
Artists can also try to achieve a 3D feel using drawing techniques specially with shading and with art style but it's still not 3D

Until someone summons an actual 3D model from genning then this should be invalid

Counter arguments:
"Oh but it looks 3D"
See reasoning above

But if it isn't enough then i should ask if realistic gens should be 100% considered photos or filmed

Updated

Balloon

Member

flowersylveon said:
The bulk update request #471 is pending approval.

change category 3d_animation (0) -> invalid
change category 3d_(artwork) (288) -> invalid

Reason: for something to be 3D there should be in fact 3D
I have searched for posts and posts and other sources but for e6ai content from directors, there are no 3D gens, only gens with the goal to achieve the "same feel" as 3d but it's still all 2D as it stands for now
Artists can also try to achieve a 3D feel using drawing techniques specially with shading and with art style but it's still not 3D

Until someone summons an actual 3D model from genning then this should be invalid

Counter arguments:
"Oh but it looks 3D"
See reasoning above

But if it isn't enough then i should ask if realistic gens should be 100% considered photos or filmed

I feel it could be worth keeping these for now if AI assisted 3D artwork and animation, e.g. 3D renderings of AI generated models, are suitable for e6AI

RedPanda

Member

How do you define 3D? Graphically, almost everything is probably 3D, or at least 2.5D. Unlike in the Middle Ages, where spatial representation was unknown and everything was truly 2D.

The reference to the number of images with the keywords isn't really meaningful, because if you look at how well the keywords were assigned, it doesn't look good. In reality, there could be thousands of images. The best example is "The Elder Scrolls." I think there were 200 images missing the keyword, and now, after adding them, there are over 400 images with the keyword. When I look at topics like Pokémon with Pokémorphs and Poképhilia, it makes me shudder. When I searched once, a good half of all the images on the first page alone needed one of the keywords.

See Balloon's avatar, also graphically 2.5-3 dimensional, but it doesn't have the keyword.

KalethOrebiter

Privileged

Some of the argument is silly: Pushed to the very limit — everything displayed on a monitor is 2D, so 3D don't exist at all.

I'm against invalidating tags without a very good reason.

I look at what the community made of the tag, and it feels like the consensus is to use it for art that imitate 2000's render look-and-feel. We have style tags like pixelart (which apply even if the images have full range of color and are not made by hand). Even photorealistic is a style (even though it's heavily moderated).