Topic: Pointlessness of downvoting

rantas said:
e6 sites maintain the philosphy that a conformist mob should always be able to downvote an unpopular post or comment into literal obscurity.

Besides, some people get confused when they don't have a measure of how bad a piece of art or someone's opinion is, and are forced, without guidance, to judge for themselves.

I do understand the fairness of the circumstance, and in most situations, I would be perfectly fine with this idea, however, that doesn't change the statement I made, all its doing is attacking people with a harmless fetish,
(I'd be fine if it targeted a fetish that was dangerous or bad like anything underage, ...which is the only fetish in a fictitious sense that seems wrong. But it's attacking people who have fetishes like gore, abdl,(which to clarify is an adult fetish, not related to doing anything with people underaged, scat, watersports...etc, which are just personal preferences for a niche group and the people posting these things are targeting their work to the people who enjoy it.

I do want to note, I'm not arguing with the philosophy, I agree art should be judged by quality, but the standard of quality, where your picking out minute details on the ai works, mean that bad art is already removed, which seems like enough of a downvote, I do believe in free speech, I do believe in freedom of opinion, and that some people have a mislead opinion, I may be in the wrong here, but, I kinda wish there was a feature that I dunno, lets say a feature that lets you share an f-list or something on the page and the site would use that list to pick out pics matching your kinks, and it ignores downvotes if per say you don't like a certain kink, that way art is being judged based on quality instead of if the person doesn't wanna see a diaper.