Thank you, knowing that the practical side of enforcing such a rule (likes when it comes to creatures that we know don't have to be as juvenile as they appear, which of course isn't strictly following TWYS but still a bit frustrating, because you can't just unlearn that knowledge) has at least been well-discussed and evaluated by staff is reassuring.

And I actually wasn't aware that deletions over content were open to dispute as much as the typical ones that are about anatomy flaws and other artifacts. Okay, that's nice. 👍

kalethorebiter said:

You said it yourself: cub looking.

If you don't think that "cub looking" is where the edge cases will be, I really don't know what to tell you.

I'm sorry, I thought you meant I was cherry-picking specific Eevee posts that happen to be edge cases (considering one of them was the OP's deleted upload), when in reality the whole species could be considered an edge case when on-model.

It's why I found it strange that quite a few have been approved in the past, even when accounting for different janitors having slightly differing views on what exactly is too young-looking.