vvartech said:
I'm not an expert, but In the first picture she has completely different pupils in both eyes. Like not even colors we talking about size and shape.

On second pic you have some holes on top of the nose and while we don't see whole left hand we can clearly how big fingers and distance between them are. I really don't think you can fit five of that fingers on a normal hand.

Yes, that's why you need to learn inpaint, Photoshop or just bruteforce 100 pics with one prompt until you get good result.

Appreciate the input. The right eye on the first pic to me looks like the light sources are refracting in her eye, obscuring her pupil. Ever look into a cat's eye and see it refract like a marble? Or the pupil reflect light back in a shade of green?

In the second pic, if you zoom out to its original size, the black spot on the nose doesn't subjectively take away from the quality of the pic. But pictures are subject to the opinions of the ones viewing them, so there's that. Zoomed in as big as PostImg can make the image, look closer at the hand. The curve of the thumb disappears in front of her, and her middle and index fingers are pressed together.
So, while I appreciate the input, I would respectfully disagree. The finger space in the middle of her fingers can be replicated in part or in full in real life: https://legendary-digital-network-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/13130941/vulcan-salute-spock-nimoy.jpeg

Now in your imagination, make that a black furry hand and put it in the same lighting conditions as the cat woman pic.

jelloponies said:
Hello friend!

Your totalitarian dictator Jello here!

I'm here to tell you that I understand it can be frustrating to have an image you uploaded removed but rather than spending all this energy defending posts with clear errors perhaps you should put that same energy into fixing them instead?
We understand that AI isn't perfect but the quality guidelines on the site exist for a reason and all the errors you brought up here can be remedied if you spend just a little extra time on the image.

Regards

Thank you for understanding the frustration. I GET the quality guidelines, I do, it reduces the amount of shit posts coming onto the site. But as stated above... it's the principal more so than the images. The wording itself says "Enough" and "Errors." which imply a tolerance level. The way the images are deleted from the site, the more accurate wording should be:

"If the errors detract from the quality of the image even in the most minuscule amount, we will delete it." instead of "Your post will get deleted if it contains enough of these errors."

No offense to the Janitor who just deleted another picture of mine, but the character had a slightly over pronounced tendon flex behind her right knee... which happens in real life with real people... an anatomical feature of the humanoid body. But that's the reason it got deleted. The so-called error wasn't detracting from the quality of the image: https://i.postimg.cc/Cx11WpsP/00186-306881543.png Tiny imperfections that look biological that don't detract from quality shouldn't be cause for deletion.

I reiterate... I'm talking principal, using the pic as an example. I'm pointing out the absurd perfectionist level of scrutiny that will get a pic deleted.

Not trying to be rude, but I call it as I see it. I'm direct, and just trying to have a conversation here.

I know it's not the intent, but it doesn't make it any less true that it makes people who post here feel like plebeians being judged by the out of touch rich people when there's ZERO tolerance for the slightest mistake.

On a lighter note... it's funny that you just owned the "Totalitarian Dictator" thing, even though I wasn't directly calling anybody that. :)

aislopper said:
That's true, but that's also why inpainting exists. When you notice your image has some errors you can use that to correct it. You can also greatly aid the process by using an image editor to lay down some edits then inpaint over that to blend them into the image. Things like cloning fingers so hands stay symmetrical with each other, cloning eyes so you have one uniform eye pattern to work with, putting some blotches down to cover up things in the image you don't or that you want recolored etc. Fluffscaler has a great guide going over inpainting.

https://rentry.org/fluffscaler-inpaint

Thank you, I'll check that out.

jelloponies said:
Another good guide written by Denatural https://denitr.wixsite.com/denatural/post/recap-of-how-i-generally-make-my-ai-picture

And thank you too, I'll check it out also.