busahou said:
The rule here restricting "young" content is concerning as well, even if I don't consider my furry gens to be so who's to say a janitor won't? What if it contains a human character that according to some obscure lore is 17? This site isn't directly affiliated with e621 from what I can tell, and I heard they started that rule over there because of the almighty advertising overlords threatening to pull out if they continued hosting said content. Is that why it's here as well?

I forgot to list one alternative: https://rule34.xxx/

The major downside is that the color scheme and ads will give you seizures.
They allow basically everything that's within the law, AI or conventional, except human underage.
Unlike here, they communicate clearly that it's got nothing to do with moral concerns, but is a sponsor/ads-related decision to ban that kind of content. However, anthros are not affected. (see under 4a: https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=forum&s=view&id=4356)
Unlike most, they don't actually think they know better than the law what minorities to needlessly discriminate against, for whatever reasons (such as the selling of dragon dildos or diffuse and evidently unfounded legal concerns around AI art).
So, there are also no absurd and arbitrary arguments over whether some cartoon character looks like 18 or 16 either, which happen to be why I stopped posting here.

edit: They don't have a no young furry rule on e621. They only banned human underage some time ago. Administration is the same. The reason here are legal concerns, which are unfounded and rather absurd, but I don't want to go into the details. Unwanted posts have a way of mysteriously disappearing here. Rule34 has been proving that there are no legal problems for a long time now. Besides, I hear e6 administration does masterful purges overnight. So, the problem could quickly get fixed in one batch operation by deleting all "young" and explicit content, if there was ever any actual need to do so. But maybe e6AIjunk just isn't worth the hassle?