Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #104600
    323 591 6 E

    raiinbow_dash said:
    I actually do agree that the claws look better, but you could easily argue that the previous claws were stylized rather than incorrect. Just because one looks better, doesn't mean the other wasn't good. By that logic, any picture of Vaporeon with blue-like-claws should also be removed, no? or any picture where the pupils are even slightly off (I'm going off the reasoning for the removal of the previous version - there was no reason stating anything about general image quality/resolution/etc.).

    You could say it is art style for the front paws agreed - but not for the hind paw imo. Those are no claws, but an AI unrecognisable thing? Not trying to be offensive, it is a great picture even not fixed, but I can see why they removed it. Just compare it with the original on twitter. We have so good and powerful tools to fix things quick and comfortable. I understand why they do it. Even when it's a bit annoying. Much love.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #104600
    323 591 6 E

    stablexai said:
    I compared both versions, and I have to say the new version is a lot better. I fav this one, but would not have faved the other.
    I can see that the moderation is sometimes a bit weird or appears unfair, it sometimes really is, but the claws on the lifted hinpaws are a reason for me to be happy you fixed them and now it's an amazing piece!
    Anything you fixed looks better now to be honest when I switch between both versions back and forward. Good job. Much love.

    I actually do agree that the claws look better, but you could easily argue that the previous claws were stylized rather than incorrect. Just because one looks better, doesn't mean the other wasn't good. By that logic, any picture of Vaporeon with blue-like-claws should also be removed, no? or any picture where the pupils are even slightly off (I'm going off the reasoning for the removal of the previous version - there was no reason stating anything about general image quality/resolution/etc.).

  • |
  • 1
  • post #104630
    92 145 1 E
    post #104600
    323 591 6 E

    I compared both versions, and I have to say the new version is a lot better. I fav this one, but would not have faved the other.
    I can see that the moderation is sometimes a bit weird or appears unfair, it sometimes really is, but the claws on the lifted hind paw are a reason for me to be happy you fixed them and now it's an amazing piece!
    Anything you fixed looks better now to be honest when I switch between both versions back and forward. Good job. Much love.

    Edit: fixed typo.

    Updated

  • |
  • 3
  • post #104006
    220 364 4 E
    20 33 1 E
    post #104613
    135 232 2 E

    Seems the AI also struggles with foreshortening horse penis a bit.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #104600
    323 591 6 E

    Agree with the description. I was confused by the removal as well. I see far more obviously wrong stuff that gets approved (that arguably should still be up, but that's not the point).

    A good comparison in my opinion is that if a tiny section of a colored drawing on e621 is missed by the artist, that doesn't get removed due to "poor quality standards" (unless the artist specifically re-uploads a 'fixed' version). I feel like that's basically equivalent to why the previous post was removed.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #104588
    104 145 5 E

    horsefucker5 said:
    Whoa 😳 I've never really considered this scenario before. Getting dom'd by a small creature like this as she climbs up on your face and pulls your hair. Gotta admit, I'm adding this to my brain

    It's never too late to see the light :)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #104593
    356 627 4 E
    post #104495
    259 378 3 E

    vonvalyn said:
    Mid flight sex, either they're showing off their skill at staying airborne even during sex or they're simply just showing off...
    Then again they could also simply not care about who sees them.
    I don't mind either way, good generation.

    Sex? On this site?! I never! What I see is very passionate mid-flight refueling.

    But for real this is a very hot idea and generation

  • |
  • 3
  • post #104593
    356 627 4 E

    horsefucker5 said:
    Hey there, looks like you've really landed on something you enjoy making with these cats. I love it too, but I was just wondering 👉👈 if you'd ever consider making some more ponies like that one Spitfire picture you made🙏

    Probably.

    Not too many people like it, so I mostly keep that stuff to myself.

  • |
  • 7
  • post #104580
    440 731 15 E
    post #104465
    135 212 1 E
    35 58 4 E

    horsefucker5 said:
    Hey there, local pony lover here. Obviously we all appreciate what you're doing here, but so far you've pretty much uploaded 7 versions of the same picture. I'm sure we'd all like to see you branch out so we can appreciate the other ponies as well, and maybe some new angles.

    Hey. I'm posting everything in the order I played with stable diffusion. So yes, I have a ton of other images (where is a different camera angle, environments, lighting, characters etc). However, I decided to share it in the order of finishing the set with a particular character (in this case with Princess Celestia) - there are two more images left.

    Be patient or find someone who does it better and will do it the way you want.

    Besides, I am not able to share ton of images at once because before I share something I need do a postwork, some corrections etc. It takes a while. 😉😛

  • |
  • 0
  • post #104575
    142 239 2 E
    post #104588
    104 145 5 E

    Whoa 😳 I've never really considered this scenario before. Getting dom'd by a small creature like this as she climbs up on your face and pulls your hair. Gotta admit, I'm adding this to my brain

  • |
  • 8
  • post #103776
    80 75 3 S

    delken said:
    SORA/GPT. Unfortunately that also means it's extremely strict for nsfw stuff

    I could live off of sfw alone so long as we have these real life wolf guys~!

  • |
  • 5
  • post #103024
    410 529 18 S

    stablexai said:
    I agree.
    Ofc realistic anthros will be fine.
    Everyone knows they do not exist IRL so it can't be a photo.
    Even if someone will tell me that is against rules it will not make me stop doing that. And in the worst case I'll just find another place to share and enjoy them.
    Being able to see realistic anthros is my main goal to generate.
    a) It does not step on furry artist toes, and b) It is dreaming about living the dream, everything else is hypocritical. (In the case of not accepting photorealistic anthros.)

    Oh, this artist has had only anthro art deleted because it looks like a photo at a glance. Or the human is too real. So no, it doesn’t even have to be feral to be deleted…

    Really, people should have a telegram channel, I want my real life werewolf boyfriends unimpeded :c

  • |
  • 2
  • post #104593
    356 627 4 E

    Hey there, looks like you've really landed on something you enjoy making with these cats. I love it too, but I was just wondering 👉👈 if you'd ever consider making some more ponies like that one Spitfire picture you made🙏

  • |
  • 0
  • 35 58 4 E

    Hey there, local pony lover here. Obviously we all appreciate what you're doing here, but so far you've pretty much uploaded 7 versions of the same picture. I'm sure we'd all like to see you branch out so we can appreciate the other ponies as well, and maybe some new angles.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #104566
    2 47 3 E
    post #104587
    70 145 1 E

    I'd fight for that Absol. Does that make me a Pokemon metaphorically?

  • |
  • 3
  • post #104488
    55 63 1 S
    post #104516
    64 87 1 S

    If robots taking the world look like this... do whatever you like oh beautiful new rulers!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #104541
    155 281 1 E
    post #104535
    96 196 1 Q
    post #104565
    199 314 3 E
    post #104588
    104 145 5 E
    post #104583
    112 185 3 Q
    post #104586
    97 158 1 E
    post #90730
    323 561 1 E
    post #104540
    133 237 2 E

    The longer I stay on this site, the more I realize Anubis was made to be a slave to human cock. He just looks so good in skimpy dresses

  • |
  • 2
  • post #71827
    183 316 1 E
    post #104580
    440 731 15 E

    Huff, this is gorgeous from start to finish. The hints of visible tongue all the way through is what sells it for me.

    Updated

  • |
  • 6
  • post #104580
    440 731 15 E
    post #104120
    89 169 3 E

    I liked this Hypno Pussy and Cock series! Something that would make it even better is to make a short video of 20 to 30 seconds, followed by a well-chosen soundtrack, it could be "By Camel" from Ankha's video or something like that, just a tip!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #103692
    167 259 5 E
    post #104499
    87 149 6 E

    zodoflashbang said:
    Why are people sexually attracted to armpits? I have nothing against them I just don't understand it

    Sensitive, self-lubricates, girlsmell.
    Next question.

  • |
  • 6
  • post #15108
    17 56 8 E
    post #103024
    410 529 18 S
    post #104411
    387 645 5 E
    post #103896
    181 288 4 E

    vermilion888 said:
    Thanks. The internal shot was very odd to make. The AI model had basicly no clue what I wanted. Just used a quick drawing as reference and prompts like, fleshy, liquid, slime, cum and so on. Was quite some tries but got better then I thought. Not that happy with the urethral process though. Looks too tubelike.

    I can imagine its quite difficult to get more exotic dicks prompted properly, but still worked out quite nicely here. Even if it looked a bit too tubelike, imo it works for like fantasy species like here. Certainly better than alternative of normal human dick.
    Guess that would also make stuff like hemipenes or more snake-like penises really difficult to get to work, outside of very specific scenarios.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #104487
    76 132 2 E

    horsefucker5 said:
    I'd love to know what reference material was used if this is what the AI thinks fucking looks like😅

    Well, you wound have to ask that the person who trained the HunyuanVideo Cowgirl LoRA, because I used that one to get that movement. 😉
    Not an ideal result, but still better than what most video models would do with such a scene.

  • |
  • 0
  • 21 33 1 E
    post #104451
    218 428 5 E
    post #53176
    29 31 1 Q
    post #104184
    71 148 1 E
    post #104451
    218 428 5 E

    simplymango said:
    Shes okay! It was more of an "embarrassed" expression. I apologize if her expression showed her being scared/uncomfortable 😔

    It’s OK man as long as she’s having fun plus she’s really cute and deserves to be happy 🥰

  • |
  • 0
  • post #104495
    259 378 3 E

    Mid flight sex, either they're showing off their skill at staying airborne even during sex or they're simply just showing off...
    Then again they could also simply not care about who sees them.
    I don't mind either way, good generation.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #50933
    64 103 4 E
    post #104499
    87 149 6 E
    post #104545
    224 427 2 E

    romvr said:
    Nice! I would love to see a Vitani danger-blowjob with some snarling between two slurps, if it is possible.

    This, so much yes!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #103795
    114 193 3 E
    post #104572
    156 241 2 E
    post #104562
    140 198 4 E

    This is second pic after first was deleted. Where i can find first? Do you have any accounts on other sites?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #104495
    259 378 3 E
    post #104452
    122 230 4 E
    post #104445
    125 196 1 E
    post #104444
    116 179 3 E
    post #104499
    87 149 6 E
    post #104571
    145 252 2 E
    post #104501
    603 1.1k 5 E
    post #104485
    473 823 2 E
    post #104545
    224 427 2 E

    Nice! I would love to see a Vitani danger-blowjob with some snarling between two slurps, if it is possible.

  • |
  • 5
  • 47 80 3 E

    Really love to see people experimenting with some new art styles on the site, and this one looks really good so far.

    If you don't mind, may I know what models are you using to achieve the style?
    I've tried in the past using fluffyrock, but never got it to generate "drawings"/"sketches" consistently.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #104408
    217 403 3 E
    post #104501
    603 1.1k 5 E
    164 302 2 E
    6 14 2 E

    cybercraft said:
    @denatural what was wrong with them? I even buffed away the flaws. Is it because of my poor skills at photo modification or because they both had two heads?

    sclera of one eye just fades into a skin, asnd the iris isnt even round. hand is warped, and generally the picture is overall is small.

    Small images: Anything below 768px in either dimension is likely to get deleted.

    And upscaling wont fix that, you will have to generate images (or img2img) in a bigger size to avoid all these issues.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #104444
    116 179 3 E
    post #104485
    473 823 2 E

    Oh my god, those are some great faces🥵👌

    She's such a good and loyal little girl for working through the pain to please her master. A+++

  • |
  • 6
  • post #104487
    76 132 2 E

    I'd love to know what reference material was used if this is what the AI thinks fucking looks like😅

  • |
  • 0
  • post #104385
    173 293 11 E

    He may look cute and innocent but dolphins are known to be very sexually aggressive.

    Their members are also prehensile which is interesting.

    Guess I like my males how I like my roller coasters, long and wild. ;3

  • |
  • 4
  • post #104395
    242 399 3 E